Incretins role in metabolic homeostasis | DMSO

Introduction

Maintaining metabolic homeostasis is essential in all living organisms, as it provides energy in the form of adenosine trisphosphate (ATP) required for cellular processes to proceed.^1,2 In healthy humans, the complex biochemical interplay between organs maintains metabolic homeostasis.^3,4 Disorders that affect this biochemical interplay, such as diabetes and obesity, result in impaired metabolic homeostasis in individuals.^4,5 The main hormones that regulate metabolic homeostasis are insulin and glucagon, which are secreted into circulation as required by islet-beta and alpha cells, respectively.^6,7 Insulin is considered to be an anabolic hormone due to its ability to positively influence glycogen, protein, fatty acid and triacylglycerol synthesis in tissues, and glucagon is considered to be a catabolic hormone due to its ability to promote the breakdown of the same in tissues.^4,8 The activity of both insulin and glucagon, which play a vital role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis, is required to accomplish strict control of glucose levels (normoglycaemia).^6,7,9 It has also been elucidated that other hormones produced by other pancreatic islet cells and the gut are crucial for maintaining metabolic homeostasis, in addition to insulin and glucagon.^10–12 Glucose when administered orally promotes significantly higher pancreatic insulin secretion than when it is administered intravenously, which is termed the “incretin effect”.^11,13 This led to the identification of two gut hormones that produce the incretin effect: glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) which are produced by L and K cells of the gut, respectively.^14,15 The incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP are confirmed to be crucial for maintaining metabolic homeostasis via augmentation of insulin secretion from islet beta-cells. The incretin effect is responsible for 60–70% of insulin secretion after glucose consumption in healthy individuals.^16,17 Thus, the activity of the pancreatic islets and the L and K cells are closely coupled to maintain metabolic homeostasis in humans.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are the main metabolic disorders given their global prevalence and economic burden.¹⁸ Globally, approximately (∼) 382 million patients were estimated to have diabetes in 2013 and ∼600 million individuals were classified as obese (BMI≥30 kg/m²) in 2014 and these numbers will increase in the future.^18,19 Inadequate energy spending together with excessive energy intake and storage induces obesity, which causes gain of weight.¹⁸ Whilst obesity manifests due to excessive diets and sedentary lifestyles, it has been established that this condition also has a genetic aetiology in some individuals, usually involving the genes involved with the central nervous system (CNS) regulation of hunger and satiety, particularly the hypothalamic leptin-melanocortin pathway.²⁰ Mutations in the melanocortin-4 receptor gene account for the most common form of monogenetic obesity.²¹ Lifestyle changes, in the form of a healthier diet and increased exercise to promote weight loss are the first treatment option for obesity, but this is often not an effective long-term strategy for patients.^18,22 Pharmacological intervention is therefore usually required to assist in long-term weight loss in obese patients, and there several available drugs for this but they often exhibit insufficient efficacy and dubious safety.^22,23 Bariatric surgery is another option for inducing weight loss in obese individuals if the aforementioned treatment strategies fail, although patients often develop post-surgery complications requiring further therapeutic intervention.^18,24

The incidence of T2D continues to increase and by 2035 it is estimated that there will be >590 million patients diagnosed with this condition.^19,25 Diabetes is defined by the World Health Organisation as a metabolic disorder of multiple aetiology characterised by chronic hyperglycaemia with disturbance of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both.²⁶ Since ~90% of diabetic patients have T2D, it is the most common form of diabetes.²⁵ The bulk of the remaining 10% of the patients are diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D), although other types exist that are rare.²⁷ Defects in insulin secretion from pancreatic beta-cells and insulin resistance in peripheral tissue result in T2D.^28,29 The aetiology of T2D has not been firmly established but diets involving excessive nutrient consumption are thought to be key to the development of this disease. Approximately 90% of patients are obese or overweight when they are diagnosed to have T2D.³⁰ The impaired metabolic homeostasis caused by diabetes results in hyperglycaemia. There are several pharmacological treatments available to augment insulin secretion or reduce peripheral tissue insulin resistance in addition to patients adopting a healthier diet and increased exercise to achieve weight loss, which promotes normoglycaemia and alleviates the disease phenotype.³¹ Bariatric surgery is another option for obese T2D patients should lifestyle changes and pharmacological treatments not produce sufficient results, although as aforementioned this surgery is typically associated with post-surgery complications in patients.¹⁸ Although treatments are available for diabetes and obesity, there are multiple long-term complications: they remain the leading causes of cardiovascular disease, eye pathology, lower limb amputation and end-stage renal disease.^26,32 Additionally, treatments are often associated with side effects and/or exhibit insufficient efficacy.^18,22–24 Therefore, more efficacious treatments for diabetes and obesity are highly desirable.

The objective of this review is to discuss the established and speculative roles that hormones released by the pancreatic islets (such as insulin and glucagon) and digestive system (incretins [GLP-1 and GIP]) play in regulating metabolic homeostasis in healthy individuals. Additionally, this review aims to highlight the currently incompletely understood complex synergistic interactions between these different hormones involved in regulating metabolic homeostasis. Some of the other hormones involved in metabolic homeostasis are also briefly mentioned in this review. Further understanding the systemic actions of each hormone in isolation or combination with others and their interactions with their respective receptors will likely enable a better understanding of the processes by which humans maintain metabolic homeostasis under healthy conditions and how these are altered during disease, which will then likely yield more effective new therapeutic options for metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity. Whilst great advancements have been made over the last century with regard to understanding the regulation of metabolic homeostasis which has yielded new therapeutic options for diseases such as T2D, it is unlikely that highly desirable more efficacious treatments will be developed for metabolic disorders until the complex systemic regulation of metabolic homeostasis becomes more intricately understood.

Hormones Produced by the Pancreatic Islets

Insulin and Glucagon Overview

The main hormones that regulate metabolism are insulin and glucagon, which are produced by pancreatic beta- and alpha-cells, respectively.^10,33 Maintaining normoglycaemia is a complex process regulated by the coordinated secretion of glucagon and insulin.⁹ Insulin is regarded as the metabolic anabolic hormone given its effects on target tissues, whereas glucagon is regarded as the metabolic catabolic hormone.^7,8 The release of glucagon and insulin in both cell types is coupled to the intracellular ATP/ADP ratio, which in turn is determined by the levels of glucose and other nutrients in the bloodstream.^5,34 A raised ATP/ADP ratio in beta-cells results in insulin secretion, whereas in alpha-cells an increased ATP/ADP ratio prevents glucagon secretion.^34,35 Evolution has developed pancreatic alpha and beta-cells to act as the ‘master regulators’ of metabolism, as their ability to secrete key hormones involved in promoting metabolic homeostasis is determined by nutrient levels in circulation.

Blood glucose concentration needs to be maintained within a narrow range as hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia are associated with pathology.^3,12 The overall purpose of the activity of these hormones is to ensure that all biological processes throughout the body are provided with adequate energy in the form of ATP for them to occur, by promoting anabolism (in the case of insulin) and catabolism (in the case of glucagon) of carbohydrates and fats in tissues as required.^7,36 The pancreas is the key organ for promoting metabolic homeostasis.^9,37 It is estimated that 4–5% of the pancreas is comprised of endocrine cells (which secrete insulin and glucagon), which are found in small clusters scattered throughout the pancreas called the islets of Langerhans, and the rest of this organ is comprised of exocrine tissue which is involved in digestion.³⁸ In a healthy human, ~70% of the cells in a pancreatic islet of Langerhans, are beta-cells, 20% are alpha-cells, and the remaining 10% consist of (in order of most to least prevalent) delta, gamma and epsilon cells.¹⁰ The different cell types in the islets are known to be able to influence each other’s activity via paracrine communication, and additionally, they can regulate their activity via autocrine feedback.³⁷ Disruption of hormone production and secretion from the pancreatic islets, as well as impaired action on target tissues, results in impaired metabolic homeostasis and diseases such as diabetes.⁵

Insulin

The human insulin gene is located on chromosome 11p15.5 and consists of three exons and two introns.³⁹ Pancreatic beta-cells are responsible for the synthesis and secretion of insulin; the insulin gene is only transcribed to mRNA in these cells.^5,40 Pancreatic beta-cells found in the islets of Langerhans are designed to act as ‘fuel sensors’ and produce and secrete insulin in response to the presence of adequate levels of nutrients in circulation.^41,42 Each mouse pancreatic beta-cell contains ~13,000 insulin granules, which account for >10% of the total cell volume, and each granule contains ~200,000 insulin molecules.⁵ In islet beta-cells, the insulin gene encodes preproinsulin, which is a 110-amino acid (aa) insulin precursor.^5,43 Preproinsulin undergoes intracellular processing to form proinsulin, which is further processed resulting in the insulin that is secreted into circulation. Insulin consists of 51aa with a molecular weight of 5.8 kDa.⁵ The fusion of insulin granules with the plasma membrane results in insulin secretion through exocytosis of granule content.³⁵ Under normal circumstances, islet beta-cell morphology is characterised by a large and stable number of intracellular mature insulin vesicles, which is sustained through the balance between biosynthesis, degradation and secretion.⁴⁴ During starvation, beta-cells adapt by markedly reducing their number of intracellular insulin vesicles via degradation, and these cells can rapidly replenish their insulin stores and return to a normal morphology in response to refeeding.^44,45 In response to overnutrition, obesity and insulin resistance, beta-cells adapt by increasing their mass and/or number, both of which result in increased capacity of insulin secretion.⁴⁶ The metabolism of islet beta-cells is designed to be sensitive to blood glucose levels as the hexokinase isozyme found in these cells is glucokinase which has a reduced affinity for substrate, resulting in glucose catabolism occurring when glucose concentration in the blood is 5mM or higher.^41,47 From a bioenergetics point of view, islet beta-cells are unique, as their intracellular ATP/ADP ratio is regulated by ATP supply and not ATP demand like in most other cell types.^41,42

Studies have unravelled that proton leak is unusually high in pancreatic beta-cells in comparison to other cell types such as muscle cells.^41,48,49 It has been reported that up to 75% of their metabolism is unproductive due to proton leak (premature leakage of protons through the inner mitochondrial membrane not mediated by ATP synthase) which is staggering, given that insulin secretion occurs in an ATP-dependent manner.⁴¹ Even after years of research, it is still largely unknown why these cells have such inefficient metabolism.^41,48,50 Reactive oxygen species (ROS) (which are generally thought to be cytotoxic molecules) produced during metabolism have been shown to amplify insulin secretion.⁴² Interestingly, islet beta-cells express reduced levels of antioxidant enzymes to deal with ROS compared to other cell types,^51,52 indicating that ROS must be useful to these cells.⁴¹ However, it is also known that an excess of ROS in these cells leads to cell damage and decreased viability.⁵⁰ Generally speaking, the amount of postprandial insulin released into circulation is directly proportional to the levels of nutrients ingested. This is due to these cells being designed to have ATP levels that reflect the nutrient levels in circulation.^53–55

In the established model of insulin secretion, islet beta-cells glucokinase firstly “senses” that the serum concentration of glucose is 5mM or greater, which triggers glycolysis leading to ATP production, glucose oxidation and ultimately insulin secretion; hence, glucose metabolism and the subsequent sequence of events which lead to insulin secretion are known as glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS).^47,53,56 GSIS is a biphasic event in healthy humans: first phase insulin release lasts only a few minutes whilst the prolonged second phase sustains insulin secretion to deal with post-prandial nutrient loads.^5,55 During the first phase of insulin secretion, islet beta-cells readily secrete synthesised insulin stored in vesicles during the initial minutes after these cells “sense” blood glucose concentrations of ≥5mM.^53,55 In humans, the first-phase insulin secretion peaks at 1.4 nmol/min, whereas the second phase results in insulin secretion at a rate of ~0.4 nmol/min.⁵ The second phase of insulin secretion consists of a prolonged response, where islet beta-cells synthesise and secrete insulin.^5,53,55 Hence, this phase mediates a steady secretion of insulin which results in a lower insulin level in the blood compared to the first phase.^53,55 It is known that both phases of insulin secretion are ATP-dependent processes.^57,58

Glycolytic products activate the tricarboxylic acid cycle in the mitochondria which leads to electron transport across the electron transport chain resulting in the production of a protonmotive force and subsequent ATP production via ATP synthase activity.⁴ The ATP production induces first-phase insulin secretion as the now raised ATP/ADP ratio in the cell leads to the closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels, which then results in membrane depolarisation.⁴¹ The membrane depolarisation causes voltage-gated calcium channels in the cell membrane to open leading to calcium ion influx into the cell, which then results in the exocytosis of insulin vesicles stored in the cytoplasm.^41,48 The ATP production also allows for second-phase insulin secretion, partly because both phases are similar mechanistically as both require ATP for the closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels.^41,53 However, they are also distinct as successful second-phase insulin secretion requires synthesizing insulin and insulin vesicles, which are not thermodynamically favourable processes; hence, ATP hydrolysis will be required in order to provide the energy for these processes to occur.^4,53,55 It has recently been elucidated that fatty acids not only augment GSIS but also induce insulin secretion in the absence of glucose.⁵⁹ However, fatty acid-induced insulin secretion in the absence of glucose is ~40% that of GSIS. Figure 1 summarises the established model of insulin secretion.

Figure 1 The canonical model of insulin secretion in pancreatic beta-cells. When the plasma glucose concentration rises to 5mM or higher, glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2), an insulin-insensitive glucose transporter, allows glucose to enter islet beta-cells from the circulation. The product of glycolysis is pyruvate which increases tricarboxylic acid cycle turnover and oxidative phosphorylation. This results in a rise in the cell’s ATP/ADP ratio which leads to the closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels, causing membrane depolarisation (due to potassium becoming sequestered in the cell) and subsequent calcium influx. The resulting calcium influx then triggers insulin secretion by causing insulin vesicles to fuse with the plasma membrane. ROS produced during oxidative phosphorylation have been shown to amplify insulin secretion, although it is not understood how they do so mechanistically. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.41,48,53,55

The nervous system also regulates insulin secretion from islet beta-cells.40 Vagal nerve stimulation induces insulin secretion during the fed state but not the fasting state.⁶⁰ When food is smelled, seen or enters the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), islet cell cholinergic muscarinic receptor activation induces insulin secretion.⁶¹ The vagal nerve stimulation of insulin release is postulated to facilitate the “cephalic phase” of insulin secretion, which occurs even before blood glucose or fat levels rise.⁶⁰ A recent systematic review found that there is little evidence for a physiologically relevant cephalic phase insulin response, although more than half of the studies examined documented its presence.⁶² Therefore, the existence of the cephalic phase of insulin secretion remains controversial and it appears to have minimal if any, physiological relevance. The parasympathetic nervous system was also shown to potentiate insulin secretion during hyperglycaemic excursions in humans.^60,63 Additionally, the nervous system has negative regulatory effects on insulin secretion, as catecholamines, through alpha2-adrenoreceptors, are known to usually inhibit insulin release during exercise, by acting downstream on signalling pathways activated by nutrient secretagogues.^40,64 Many of the mechanisms by which neurotransmitters regulate insulin secretion remain unclear and this area requires further investigation.⁶⁵

The aa arginine promotes insulin secretion in an ATP-independent manner, as it increases potassium permeability resulting in depolarisation and subsequent insulin secretion.^40,66 Leucine also positively regulates insulin secretion as it generates ATP via the Krebs cycle by allosterically stimulating glutamic dehydrogenase and producing alpha-ketoglutarate.⁶⁷ How dietary amino acids modulate insulin secretion is discussed in more detail in another review.⁶⁸ Proinsulin synthesis is induced in islet beta-cells when plasma glucose levels are greater than 2mM, ensuring that there is a sufficient reservoir of insulin secretory stores available for when secretion is needed to promote nutrient uptake from the circulation into tissues.⁴⁴ Interestingly, other macronutrients (for example fatty acids) do not induce proinsulin biosynthesis, in spite of their ability to act as potent secretagogues for insulin secretion;^44,69 it has been demonstrated that intracellular insulin stores can become depleted under chronic hyperlipidaemic conditions.⁶⁹ Whilst some studies have found that neither exogenously added nor secreted insulin has any autocrine signalling effect, this remains an area of controversy.^70–72

Once released into circulation, insulin mediates its anabolic effects on target tissues by binding to its receptor (insulin receptor) on target tissues.⁴⁰ Insulin receptor is expressed in skeletal muscle, adipocytes, kidneys, brain, blood vessels, heart, liver, pancreatic endocrine cells (such as islet alpha and beta-cells), bone and the GIT.^8,40 Glucose entry into these cells occurs in an ATP-independent manner and is mediated by glucose transporters (GLUTs).⁷³ Three GLUT isoforms are expressed in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: GLUT1, GLUT3 and GLUT4.⁴⁰ The main mechanism by which insulin induces blood glucose uptake into skeletal muscle and adipose tissue is by stimulating the GLUT4 translocation from intracellular pools to the plasma membrane.⁷⁴ The increased supply of glucose into these tissues results in the promotion of glycogen synthesis or increased fat storage under resting conditions.^8,74 Insulin also increases the enzymatic activity of both hexokinase and 6-phosphofructokinase which results in enhanced glycolysis and glucose metabolism.^8,75 Additionally, insulin also increases the activity of glycogen synthase and inhibits the activity of glycogen phosphorylase to further promote glycogen synthesis.⁸ Inhibition of glycogen phosphorylase is a very important effect of insulin as the catalytic capacity of this enzyme is 50-fold higher than glycogen synthase in human skeletal muscle.⁸ Subsequently, the promotion of net intracellular glycogen synthesis requires glycogen phosphorylase activity to be inhibited by ~99%.

One study showed that insulin’s ability to induce glycogen synthesis was dependent on this hormone’s ability to inhibit phosphorylase activity – the stimulation of glucose uptake and glycogen synthase was not enough to promote net glycogen synthesis.⁷⁶ Skeletal muscle accounts for 60–70% of the blood glucose uptake due to insulin action, and it has been estimated that adipose tissue accounts for ~10% of the insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose uptake.⁴⁰ Insulin also promotes protein synthesis in skeletal muscle, liver, adipose tissue and other tissues, whilst simultaneously decreasing the rate of protein degradation in these tissues.^8,40 The liver, similar to islet beta-cells, does not depend on insulin to uptake glucose from circulation.⁴⁰ When blood glucose concentrations are high enough, liver cells uptake glucose from circulation and store it as glycogen.^4,40 Insulin stimulation results in fatty acid synthesis in the adipose tissue, liver and lactating mammary glands, whilst simultaneously inhibiting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation in the liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue.^8,40 Insulin receptor activation in islet alpha-cells suppresses glucagon secretion, and interestingly, pancreatic beta-cells also express insulin receptor and it has been postulated that insulin may positively regulate GSIS and promote cellular proliferation.^40,77,78 However, a recent study demonstrated in mice that secreted insulin in response to GSIS mediates insulinostatic actions via insulin receptor on islet beta-cells.⁷⁹ Insulin has also been shown to have anabolic effects on bone by stimulating osteoblasts whilst suppressing osteoclast function.⁸⁰ Given the effects of insulin on metabolic fuel storage, it is considered to be an anabolic hormone.⁸

Although the brain is not dependent on insulin for glucose uptake, insulin receptors have been detected in the hypothalamus, olfactory bulb, retina, hippocampus, vessels of the choroid plexus and regions of the striatum and cerebral cortex.⁸¹ It has been hypothesised that insulin moves through the blood-brain barrier into the brain and acts as a neuropeptide positively regulating satiety, olfaction, cognition and memory as well as regulating systemic functions such as hepatic glucose production.^82,83 However, it has not been elucidated if insulin is locally synthesised in the brain or if it is transported from circulation in order to mediate any effects.^40,84 Additionally, by increasing lipid storage in adipose tissue, insulin indirectly induces leptin release from adipocytes, which strongly mediates satiety by acting on hypothalamic brain cells expressing the leptin receptor.^8,85 The importance of leptin is demonstrated in leptin-deficient humans and mice, which develop obesity and have chronic hunger.⁸⁶

Plasma adiponectin levels are also regulated by insulin action as the increased adiposity induced by the anabolic effects of insulin reduces adiponectin secretion from adipocytes: circulating adiponectin levels are inversely correlated with adiposity.⁸⁷ It has been shown that adiponectin increases insulin sensitivity in the liver and skeletal muscle, which is thought to be due to its ability to increase lipid and glucose metabolism.⁸⁸ Hence, the effect of insulin counteracts the action of adiponectin by promoting nutrient storage in these tissues; the synergistic action of both of these hormones may, therefore, produce a desirable net effect on nutrient anabolism/catabolism. Interestingly, adiponectin inhibits lipolysis in adipocytes giving it insulin-like effects on adipocytes, so during fasting and a subsequent decrease in adiposity, the actions of this hormone prevent lipolysis.⁸⁹ This seems counterproductive as during the fasting state adipocytes need to release stored fat and it is likely glucagon action promotes net lipolysis in adipocytes- perhaps adiponectin reduces the rate of lipolysis to stop hyperlipidaemia. Overexpressing adiponectin in leptin-deficient (ob/ob) mice results in decreased plasma glucose and insulin levels, increased liver and muscle insulin sensitivity (which is thought to be due to decreased fat content), significantly increased mass of adipose tissue (these mice were morbidly obese) and a highly significant lowering of plasma triglycerides and FFAs. The diabetic phenotype in these mice was completely reversed by overexpressing adiponectin in these mice.⁹⁰

Insulin was shown to reduce resistin mRNA levels in mouse 3T3-L1 adipocytes, suggesting that resistin may counteract the systemic anabolic effects of insulin and may therefore be important during fasting.⁹¹ Several studies have reported a positive relationship between insulin resistance, obesity and increased serum resistin in mouse models as increased resistin plasma levels were observed in diet-induced and ob/ob obese mice, anti-resistin antibodies increased insulin sensitivity in obese and insulin-resistant animals, healthy mice treated with recombinant resistin exhibited reduced glucose tolerance and insulin action, and resistin dampened insulin-induced glucose uptake in mouse adipocytes.⁹² It has been difficult to apply these findings to humans as resistin secretion is different between these two species. Resistin is mainly secreted from adipose tissue in mice whereas it is mainly secreted from monocytes in humans.⁹² Further, human resistin only shares 59% homology with mouse resistin at the amino acid level. Discrepancies exist in the data regarding the relationship between resistin and obesity and/or diabetes in humans as well as rodents.⁹² In human studies, resistin levels in circulation were either increased or unchanged in obese individuals with or without insulin resistance.^93,94 Another study has shown that resistin expression was significantly increased in obese people but no association was found with T2D.⁹⁵ In contrast, another study found that resistin levels were higher in T2D patients and individuals with impaired fasting glucose.⁹⁶ Furthermore, some studies have observed that resistin is downregulated in the adipose tissue of obese mice.⁹⁷ Therefore, it is not clear how resistin activity, as a result of insulin action, plays a role in obesity, insulin resistance and T2D given the findings from various studies.

Nitric oxide is a key molecule produced in the vasculature, which mediates endothelial-dependent relaxation and inhibits platelet aggregation, smooth muscle proliferation and cell adhesion.⁴⁰ Insulin plays an important role in nitric oxide production and is therefore also important for maintaining cardiovascular homeostasis.⁹⁸ The kidney expresses insulin receptors in the proximal tubules and insulin binding results in increased sodium reabsorption.⁹⁹ Ghrelin is a hormone that increases appetite, gastric acid secretion and gastrointestinal motility.^100,101 Ghrelin-secreting cells in the GIT express insulin receptor and insulin action negatively regulates ghrelin secretion.¹⁰² Hence, insulin indirectly reduces gastrointestinal motility, appetite and gastric acid secretion due to its suppression of ghrelin.

Knockout of insulin receptor in mice results in slight growth retardation at birth, but no metabolic abnormalities are present.¹⁰³ However, after birth, these mice exhibit islet beta-cell failure and hyperglycaemia occurs within a few days followed by diabetic ketoacidosis and subsequent death. This demonstrates that insulin is not crucial for prenatal growth but is for postnatal metabolic homeostasis in mice. Insulin receptor knockout or suppression in individual organs in mice results in severely impaired glucose uptake in skeletal muscle; decreased fat storage in adipose tissue with normal levels of glucose and fatty acids in circulation; increased gluconeogenesis in the liver accompanied with systemic insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia and glucose intolerance; decreased islet beta-cell proliferation and insulin secretion, and insulin receptor knockout in neurons increase appetite.¹⁰⁴

Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1 and IGF-2) are hormones that share homology with insulin and have been shown to activate the insulin receptor, and insulin can also bind to IGF receptors (IGF-1R and IGF-2R).¹⁰⁵ Insulin receptor and IGFRs exhibit a high affinity for their ligand but can also bind each other’s ligands but with a much lower affinity.⁴⁰ However, the physiological effect of insulin and IGF-1 binding to each other’s receptors has not been well studied. Both IGF-1R and insulin receptor activation promote anabolic processes in various tissues so it is reasonable to assume that when insulin binds to IGF-1R and IGF-1 binds to the insulin receptor, they induce the anabolic processes usually associated with these receptors binding their main ligands.^40,105 However, given that IGF-1R and insulin receptor have decreased affinity for each other’s main ligand in comparison to their main ligand, it is likely that insulin and IGF-1 cannot stimulate the anabolic effects of each other’s receptor activation to the same degree as the main ligands for insulin receptor and IGF-1R at physiological concentrations.

Glucagon

Glucagon is a 29aa hormone that is produced by the preproglucagon gene.¹¹ The preproglucagon gene is located on chromosome 2 (2q36-q37) spanning an estimated 9.4kb comprising of six exons and five introns, and exons 2 to 5 encode the proteins with known biological roles: glucagon is encoded in exon 3.¹⁰⁶ The preproglucagon gene is transcribed to mRNA and then translated to form the preproglucagon protein (180aa residues), which is then cleaved in pancreatic alpha-cells, gut endocrine L-cells and neurons in the caudal brainstem and hypothalamus.¹¹ Proglucagon (160aa residues) is then produced in these tissues by the removal of the signal peptide from the preproglucagon protein.¹¹ In islet alpha-cells, prohormone convertase 2 modifies proglucagon to produce glucagon, which is formed by the removal of aa residues adjacent to 33 and 61 of proglucagon.^26,107 Figure 2 summarises how proglucagon is processed in different tissues.

Figure 2 A summary of how proglucagon is alternatively processed in different tissues to produce the desired products. Proglucagon undergoes alternative processing by prohormone convertase enzymes in islet alpha-cells, L-cells of the gut and neuronal cells. Glucagon and GLP-1 are both pivotal hormones needed to maintain metabolic homeostasis. Only the biologically active products are shown and just GLP-1 and glucagon activity are discussed in this review. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.26,107,108,112

Islet alpha-cells detect the absence of or low levels of glucose in circulation via hormone-insensitive sodium-coupled GLUT2, which results in the generation of action potentials of Na⁺ and Ca²⁺.34 The generation of action potentials results in the influx of calcium and exocytosis of glucagon granules.¹¹⁰ Similar to beta-cells, alpha-cells rely on ATP-dependent K⁺ (KATP) channels to play a key role in promoting exocytosis of intracellular granules, as they couple flux of glucose concentration in circulation to changes in membrane potential and calcium influx.^34,110 At low glucose concentrations in circulation, alpha-cells have a low ATP/ADP ratio, which then permits ATP-dependent K⁺ channels to be open allowing for the efflux of potassium.^34,110,111 Figure 3 summarises the regulation of glucagon secretion.

Figure 3 Regulation of glucagon secretion in pancreatic alpha-cells. Sodium-coupled GLUT2 receptor allows glucose to enter islet alpha-cells in an inuslin independent manner. When glucose is absent or at low levels in circulation, glycolysis and mitochondrial ATP production is greatly decreased leading to a decreased intracellular ATP/ADP ratio. This then allows for ATP-dependent K+ channels to be open, as ATP molecules block this channel. Opening of the ATP-dependent K+ channels then allows for intracellular potassium efflux which causes membrane depolarisation to an electrical range that permits opening of Ca2+ channels, which in turn, allows for extracellular calcium influx. The raised intracellular calcium levels then trigger glucagon secretion by causing glucagon vesicles to fuse with the plasma membrane. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.34,110,111

Additionally, the nervous system is also important for glucagon release. Hypoglycaemia results in the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems mediating glucagon secretion from islet alpha-cells.113 The nervous system also inhibits glucagon secretion indirectly through the insulin secretion that it induces during the fed state.⁶⁰ When blood glucose concentration rises, this then raises the intracellular ATP/ADP ratio in islet alpha-cells. The ATP then blocks the channel which depolarises alpha-cells to a membrane potential range where channels involved in action potentials are inactivated, meaning that calcium influx and subsequent exocytosis of glucagon vesicles no longer occur.³⁴

Once released into circulation, glucagon mediates its effects on target tissues by binding to its receptor (glucagon receptor [GCGR]) on target tissues. GCGR is a class B G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) consisting of 485aa.³⁴ GCGR is expressed in the liver, brain, kidney, GIT, pancreatic alpha and beta-cells, heart and adipose tissue.^34,114 During the fasting state, glucagon promotes gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes by inducing glycogen breakdown.¹¹⁴ The glucose produced by this glycogen breakdown is exported into circulation which ensures sufficient plasma glucose levels so that glucose-dependent organs can produce enough ATP for their biological processes.^4,115 It has been elucidated that glucagon acts as a positive autocrine regulator of islet alpha-cell function by inducing exocytosis of glucagon vesicles by acting on GCGR present on the surface of these cells.¹¹⁶ Exocytosis from islet alpha cells was blocked by a GCGR antagonist after glucagon administration.¹¹⁶ Studies have shown that glucagon action reduces fatty acid synthesis in adipose tissue and the liver, and additionally, this hormone induces lipolysis causing fatty acids to be released into the circulation from these tissues, which then enables them to be transported to the target tissues such as skeletal muscle to be catabolised to generate ATP when required.¹¹⁷ Interestingly, glucagon also exerts insulinotropic effects on islet beta-cells, and this is likely to allow for tissues to uptake glucose and fat once glucagon has induced their catabolism from nutrient storage (as tissues such as skeletal muscle rely on insulin for nutrient uptake from circulation), or the insulinotropic effects of glucagon could simply serve as a feedback inhibition mechanism.^114,118 One study demonstrated the insulinotropic effect of glucagon, as when GCGR was blocked with an antagonist the insulin release was approximately halved in response to 10mmol glucose.¹¹⁸ This shows that insulin’s negative effect on glucagon secretion during the fed state likely prevents hyperinsulinemia.

It has been shown that glucagon can bind to GLP-1R, with a 100–1000-fold decreased affinity than GLP-1, promoting insulin release due to its homology with GLP-1. However, the insulinotropic effect of glucagon was confirmed not to be mediated by glucagon binding to GLP-1R here, as glucagon-enhanced insulin secretion was greatly dampened by the antagonism of GCGR.¹¹⁹ As glucagon can bind to GLP-1R, it may also be able to weakly stimulate insulin secretion through the action of this receptor as well as promote apoptotic resistance, proliferation and increased glucose sensing, as all of these effects are associated with GLP-1R activation.^107,120 The strongest evidence that glucagon can induce insulin release via GLP-1R comes from rodent studies investigating the effect of GLP-1R antagonism and knockout.¹²¹ Glucagon’s effect on bone is not particularly well studied. However, studies from the 1970s have demonstrated that glucagon had anabolic effects on bone in patients with Paget’s disease.¹²² Recently, glucagon was also reported to have a positive effect on bone metabolism in T2D patients implying that this hormone increases the rate of skeletal modelling.¹²³ Curiously, glucagon has been shown to induce satiety in both human and rat studies,¹²⁴ which is surprising as this hormone is released into circulation due to a decrease in plasma levels of nutrients, and thereby it induces the breakdown of stored nutrients so that tissues throughout the body have fuel to generate ATP when needed.¹¹⁴ Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that glucagon would act to increase appetite, but, in reality, the opposite is the case.

Interestingly, studies have revealed that loss of function mutations in GCGR results in alpha-cell hyperplasia which results in glucagon cell adenomatosis in humans.^125,126 Glucagon cell adenomatosis also occurs in patients without GCGR mutations, but these individuals usually have fewer and smaller tumours, as well as less islet alpha-cell hyperplasia.¹²⁵ GCGR knockout mice produced in one study had islet alpha-cell hyperplasia and these mice were additionally shown to have large increases of glucagon and GLP-1 levels in circulation, but interestingly they had lower plasma glucose levels throughout the day, similar insulin levels and improved glucose tolerance compared to GCGR+ control animals.¹²⁷ GCGR knockout is detrimental in mice as 50% did not survive until birth in this study. Furthermore, these mice exhibited delayed islet beta-cell differentiation and perturbed proportion of beta- to alpha-cells in embryonic islets. In adults, alpha-cell progression to maturity was hindered, the mRNA levels of several beta-cell genes (GLUT2, pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 (PDX-1), and Maf-A) involved in insulin production and secretion were decreased, and there was an increase in the number and rate of proliferation of islet alpha-, beta- and delta-cells. Similar observations were found in GCGR knockout Zebrafish.¹²⁸ These findings demonstrate that glucagon activity regulates the proportion of the different endocrine cell types in islets, the number of islets in the pancreas, and the development of the mature alpha-cell phenotype. GCGR knockout mice had unusually high levels of plasma GLP-1, which was shown to be due to increased L-cell number induced by GLP-1 action, even though L-cells do not express GLP-1R¹²⁹. This suggests that GLP-1 action on L-cells is mediated through paracrine and/or neuronal signals. Additionally, glucagon has been shown to have anti-apoptotic effects on hepatocytes stimulated by Fas ligand activation and different experimental models of hepatotoxicity, and GCGR knockout results in increased hepatic susceptibility to apoptotic injury.¹³⁰

In summary, insulin promotes the storage of ingested nutrients for the body to be able to utilise these nutrients when needed to generate ATP, and glucagon induces the breakdown of these stored nutrients when the body needs to utilise them during fasting or exercise.⁴ Figure 4 summarises the effects of insulin and glucagon on target tissues.

Figure 4 A summary of the effects that insulin and glucagon have on various organs after they have been released in response to the fed or fasting state, respectively. Both hormones have direct and indirect (highlighted red) effects on all of these organs. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.4,8,34,40,77,78,80,104,116–119

Somatostatin

Somatostatin, which is a hormone released by islet-delta cells, has been shown to have negative effects on both insulin and glucagon secretion.128 Additionally, somatostatin is also produced by endocrine cells in the central nervous system (resulting in decreased growth hormone secretion) and the GIT (resulting in slowed digestion).^128,131,132 The half-life of somatostatin is 10 Somatostatin receptors are known to be expressed in several tissues such as the GIT, brain, pancreatic islets, kidney, liver, spleen, heart, adrenal gland, immune system and lung.^128,133,134 The release of somatostatin occurs similarly to insulin secretion from islet beta-cells, but somatostatin secretion is induced at plasma glucose concentrations as low as 3mM.¹³⁵ Exogenously administered somatostatin inhibits glucagon release from islet alpha-cells and insulin release from islet beta-cells, and antibodies against somatostatin induce glucagon secretion from islet alpha-cells.^136,137 Conflicting findings were reported when studies examined the local effect of somatostatin on glucagon release with isolated perfused pancreases.^138,139

Exposing rat perfused pancreas to somatostatin receptor antagonists resulted in weakly enhanced glucagon secretion in response to glucose, but strongly enhanced secretion in response to arginine.¹⁴⁰ Somatostatin knockout mice were initially reported to have a moderate phenotype, and most notably there were changes in the release of their pituitary hormones.¹⁴¹ However, a more recent study has shown that arginine-induced release of glucagon and insulin is significantly stimulated in mice due to the deletion of the somatostatin receptor gene, but basal insulin and glucagon levels were not affected.¹⁴² Interestingly, somatostatin knockout mice did not exhibit suppressed glucagon secretion from islet alpha-cells upon rising glucose concentrations in this study. Basal levels of insulin and glucagon were similar between somatostatin knockout mice and controls. However, after stimulation with 20mM glucose, somatostatin knockout mice had increased plasma insulin and glucagon levels. The inhibition of GSIS by lowering glucose levels was similar though between somatostatin knockout and wild-type mice. One study reported that somatostatin does not suppress insulin secretion by acting on the central nervous system but acts peripherally on islet beta-cells.¹⁴³ It is correct to state that somatostatin does reduce the incretin effect as it suppresses GIP and GLP-1 release from the GIT, giving it an indirect role in dampening insulin secretion.¹⁴⁴ These findings suggest that physiological concentrations of somatostatin reduce glucagon secretion during low glucose and insulin secretion during high glucose levels. A recent study demonstrated that in mice somatostatin and glucagon secretion are linked in a reciprocal feedback cycle with somatostatin inhibiting glucagon secretion at low and high glucose levels, and glucagon stimulating somatostatin secretion via the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors.¹⁴⁵ One study demonstrated that somatostatin also likely mediates satiety.¹⁴⁶ The effect of the nervous system on somatostatin release has not been well studied in humans but it has been shown that the vagal nerve has inhibitory effects on isolated perfused rat and pig pancreases.¹⁴⁷

Pancreatic Polypeptide

Pancreatic polypeptide is produced by islet gamma-cells during the postprandial period, peaking at 15–30 minutes which is followed by a lower sustained phase lasting for up to 6 hours after nutrient ingestion.¹⁴⁸ Receptors for pancreatic polypeptide have been detected in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus located in the brainstem, and more recently pancreatic polypeptide has also been shown to act on a different receptor expressed in islet alpha-cells.^149,150 The vagal nerve is the main stimulator of pancreatic polypeptide secretion during the postprandial period.¹⁵¹ In healthy humans, pancreatic polypeptide has been shown to weakly increase basal insulin secretion by unknown mechanisms but it does not seem to have any effect on GSIS.¹⁵² In contrast, another study found that pancreatic polypeptide inhibited GSIS in rat and human beta-cell lines and isolated mouse islets¹⁵³ In this study native pancreatic polypeptide also protected against beta-cell apoptosis. Direct exposure of pancreatic polypeptide to mouse islets suppressed glucagon release from islet alpha-cells.¹⁴⁹ Another study found that pancreatic polypeptide decreases somatostatin secretion in mice and human islets.¹⁵⁴ Pancreatic polypeptide deficient patients, as a result of pancreatic resection or chronic pancreatitis, exhibit reversed hepatic insulin resistance upon pancreatic polypeptide infusion.^155,156 Comparable observations were found in animal models of chronic pancreatitis or pancreas resection.¹⁵⁷ Pancreatic polypeptide is thought to be important in inducing satiety as pancreatic polypeptide plasma levels are nearly eliminated in obese children with Prader-Willi syndrome. Bovine pancreatic polypeptide infusion has reduced food intake in both Prader-Willi syndrome patients and healthy humans.^158–160 Pancreatic polypeptide was also shown to reduce food intake in ob/ob mice and increase energy expenditure.¹⁶¹ Pancreatic polypeptide is known to reduce pancreatic secretion to slow digestion but the effects on the rest of the GIT in humans are not currently clear.^162,163

Ghrelin

Ghrelin is produced by the stomach and the islet epsilon-cells during the pre-prandial period and it has a half-life of ~30 minutes.^164,165 The nervous system also modulates ghrelin secretion, as sympathetic nerve excitation stimulates ghrelin secretion from the GIT.¹⁶⁶ The effect of the nervous system on ghrelin release from the pancreas is not well-studied.¹⁶⁵ The main action of ghrelin is to induce hunger by acting on hypothalamic brain cells expressing the ghrelin receptor.¹⁶⁷ It has been elucidated that by acting on these cells, ghrelin increases gastric acid secretion and gastrointestinal motility also to prepare for nutrient ingestion.¹⁶⁸ Ghrelin also mediates insulinostatic actions even though human beta-cells do not express any known receptors for ghrelin, but a recent study discovered that the ghrelin receptor is expressed solely by delta-cells, implying that ghrelin dampens insulin secretion by inducing somatostatin release.¹⁶⁹ However, in rodents, ghrelin mediates insulinostatic actions via direct mechanisms.¹⁷⁰

Treatment with ghrelin does not affect insulin secretion at 5.5mM glucose but significantly reduces it (by ~30%) at 16.8mM glucose. Given that ghrelin should not be produced during the fed state, it is unlikely that it modulates insulin secretion associated with the postprandial period. However, it may dampen any minimal insulin secretion during fasting given its insulinostatic actions, which would indirectly assist glucagon’s ability to release nutrients from storage. Interestingly, it has been elucidated that ghrelin’s insulinostatic actions are accompanied by a simultaneous increase in plasma glucose levels and the enhanced ability of insulin to suppress glucose production in ghrelin knockout mice has been reported, but it is not clear how this was achieved mechanistically.¹⁷¹ Hence, it seems likely that ghrelin induces glycogenolysis and/or inhibits glucose uptake into peripheral tissues from circulation via direct mechanisms. A more recent study found that ghrelin inhibited GSIS in islets from non-T2D and T2D donors and that ghrelin mRNA expression and fasting circulating ghrelin levels were lower in T2D patients.¹⁷² The findings from this study further support ghrelin’s ability to mediate insulinostatic actions, and that reduction in plasma ghrelin could either promote T2D pathogenesis or be an adaptive response to stop further reduction in insulin secretion in T2D patients. Results from studies indicate that ghrelin also promotes lipid retention in adipocytes, which seems paradoxical given this hormone’s role as a hunger hormone, as during starvation lipids need to be released from stores and catabolised for ATP production, although it has also been argued that ghrelin protects fat stores from being utilised so that they can be used for ATP production during prolonged starvation.^173,174

Incretin Hormones

In the latter half of the nineteenth century, understanding the external and internal secretion mechanisms of the pancreas became a focus for European physiologists. It was noticed in this period that the pancreas was the origin of diabetes mellitus.¹⁷⁵ In 1906, after the discovery of secretin, it was first tested if the gut aided the pancreas with disposing of nutrients via stimulation of pancreatic internal secretion by Moore and colleagues, who orally administered porcine small intestinal extract to treat diabetic patients.¹⁷⁶ The results of this oral intake were not only negative but also inconclusive, which would be expected due to the lack of the modern-day understanding that proteins are proteolytically degraded in the stomach. After the discovery of insulin in 1922, new attempts were made to investigate the influence of the intestinal mucosa on blood glucose concentration.¹⁷⁵ In 1928, it was demonstrated by Zunc and LaBarre that the injection of secretin, which is extracted from the small intestinal mucosa, shows a hypoglycaemic effect that is mediated by the pancreas.¹⁷⁷ The name incretin was then developed by LaBarre to describe a substance that only causes hypoglycemia but does not promote pancreatic exocrine secretion.¹⁷⁸ For the next few decades, false-negative conclusions were drawn from several subsequent studies, which stated that the existence of an incretin hormone was unlikely, hindering any further investigation into this area.¹⁷⁵ During the 1960s, it was demonstrated that orally administered glucose promotes markedly greater pancreatic insulin secretion than that induced by intravenously administered glucose, despite the plasma glucose levels being very similar- this was termed the “incretin effect”.^11,179–181

GIP is secreted by K cells in the small intestine. It was first isolated, as an inhibitor of gastric acid secretion, from porcine small intestine crude extracts.^13,182 Subsequently, it was discovered that GIP could also promote insulin secretion in animals and humans, and henceforth, it was named glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide.^11,183 In 1981, antibodies against GIP were demonstrated to not stop the incretin effect.¹⁸⁴ Another incretin hormone was then discovered, GLP-1, which was first identified in the translational products of mRNAs isolated from anglerfish pancreatic islets.¹⁸⁵ Subsequently, it was shown that hamster and human preproglucagon cDNAs encode GLP-1 and −2, but only GLP-1 displayed incretin activity.¹⁸⁶ The incretin hormones play a crucial role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis via augmentation of insulin secretion from islet-beta-cells: the incretin effect accounts for 60–70% of total insulin released from the pancreas during the postprandial period.¹⁷ It is estimated that GIP and GLP-1 mediate 60 and 40% of the incretin effect, respectively.¹⁶ However, islet beta-cells can produce and secrete insulin in an incretin-independent manner as long as blood glucose levels are 5mM or higher.^4,17 Both GIP and GLP-1 mediate their actions by binding to their specific GPCRs on target tissues: GIP binds to the GIP receptor (GIPR) and GLP-1 binds to GLP-1R.¹²⁰ It has been demonstrated that genetic ablation of GIPR and GLP-1R either individually or at the same time in mice results in impaired insulin secretion confirming that both GIP and GLP-1 mediate the incretin effect.¹⁸⁷

GLP-1 Production and Secretion

GLP-1, which is a 30aa-long incretin hormone, is secreted by enteroendocrine L-cells present in the distal ileum and colon of the GIT in response to postprandial food intake.¹⁰⁷ GLP-1 is formed by alternative processing of the preproglucagon by prohormone convertase 1/3 (Figure 3).¹¹ Exon 4 encodes GLP-1.¹⁰⁶ GLP-1 is also generated similarly in the central nervous system.^107,108 Although the pancreatic beta-cells are the well-characterised target for GLP-1, the incretin hormone also targets multiple other organs.¹⁰⁷ GLP-1’s ability to mediate the incretin effect is its most studied and significant physiological effect due to the use of GLP-1 analogues (exenatide and liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, albiglutide and semaglutide) in T2D treatment.^26,107 The targeting of GLP-1 physiologically on organs other than the pancreas has not been well studied but it is becoming increasingly clear that this hormone does modulate the biological activity of a variety of organs throughout the body. GLP-1 mediates its actions by binding to its receptor (GLP-1R), which is localised at the cell surface, in target tissues.^11,26

After GLP-1 has been produced from proglucagon, its stability is improved by the conversion of the carboxyl group of 36th aa (arginine) to an amide (GLP-1 [1–36 amide]).¹⁰⁷ Before secretion, 1–6aa are cleaved from GLP-1 (1–36 amide) and GLP-1 (1–37) to form GLP-1 (7–36 amide) and C-terminal amidated GLP-1 (7–37). It is estimated that GLP-1 released into the bloodstream contains 80% in the GLP-1 (7–36 amide) form and the remaining 20% is in the GLP-1 (7–37) form.²⁶ The two versions of GLP-1 are ~50% homologous with glucagon,¹⁸⁸ and they both have similar affinity for the GLP-1R and also exhibit similar potency.²⁶ Nevertheless, it has been suggested that GLP-1 (7–36 amide) has greater stability in the circulation so there may be a physiological reason as to why GLP-1 is produced in two forms.¹¹

It has been established that there is a positive correlation between GLP-1 levels in the circulation and the amount of nutrients L-cells are exposed to.¹⁸⁹ Initially, GLP-1 secretion by L-cells was believed to occur in a glucose-dependent manner. However, it has been shown that GLP-1 secretion in response to mixed nutrients (carbohydrates, fats and proteins) intake is much higher than that secreted after glucose ingestion.¹⁹⁰ This suggests that fats, proteins and glucose have a synergistic effect on GLP-1 secretion. Additionally, it has been shown that fats and proteins can promote GLP-1 secretion in the absence of glucose.¹⁸⁹ Ingestion of nutrients has also been shown to increase GLP-1 expression at mRNA level in L-cells.¹⁹¹ In the postprandial period, GLP-1 levels rise in the circulation to 40–60pM from 5–15pM during fasting.^26,192 After food ingestion, the GLP-1 response is initiated within 15 minutes and reaches the maximum in 30 minutes.^55,189,193 It is currently elusive why the GLP-1 response occurs so rapidly but it is speculated that L-cells in the upper jejunum and the vagal nerve play a role.¹⁰⁷ However, the response occurs after the “cephalic phase” of insulin secretion implying that any neuronal signals that promote insulin release do not induce GLP-1 secretion.^26,107 Although neuronal regulation of GLP-1 secretion is not well-studied in humans, studies using rodents have found that GLP-1 secretion from L-cells in response to GIP stimulation is induced by the nervous system. This seems plausible given that L-cells express receptors that participate in neuronal signalling.^144,194 L-cells have been shown to express receptors for metabolic hormones including, but not limited to, insulin, leptin and GIP, although the degree to which leptin and insulin stimulate overall GLP-1 secretion is currently elusive/unclear. GIP-mediated GLP-1 release has been shown to occur in rodents via acetylcholine release by the enteric nervous system.^194–199 Supraphysiological concentrations of GIP could potentially activate GIPRs on L-cells, enhancing GLP-1 secretion. Figure 5 summarises the regulation of GLP-1 secretion.

Figure 5 A summary of the processes in L-cells that are known to lead to/may lead to GLP-1 secretion into the circulation. Sodium entry into the L-cell promotes calcium influx by inducing depolarisation and glucose and fatty acids also induce calcium influx by raising ATP levels as a result of their catabolism. The now elevated calcium levels promote exocytosis of GLP-1-containing vesicles, resulting in GLP-1 being released into circulation. Proteins also promote GLP-1 release, but it is not currently mechanistically understood how. This figure is reproduced from (Reed J, Bain S, Kanamarlapudi V. Recent advances in understanding the role of glucagon-like peptide 1. F1000Research. 2020; 9(239):1–14; Creative Commons)32 and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.194–199

The half-life of GLP-1 in the circulation is between 1–2 minutes.107 Dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) is the enzyme responsible for the majority of the rapid GLP-1 degradation, by cleaving the first two N-terminal residues from GLP-1 (7–36 amide) and GLP-1 (7–37) to form GLP-1 (9–36 amide) and GLP-1 (9–37), respectively.^11,107 After both forms of GLP-1 have been exposed to DPP-IV, they are either rendered inactive or become an antagonist for the GLP-1R.¹⁰⁷ Interestingly, only an estimated 15% of the active GLP-1 reaches the portal vein before the liver, due to the rapid inactivation through DPP-IV.^26,107 Therefore, it is thought that ~85% of GLP-1 present in the circulation is in an inactive form.²⁶ From a bioenergetics angle, the GLP-1 response is highly inefficient (GLP-1 synthesis requires ATP), due to the majority of the GLP-1 secreted being inactivated before it reaches its targets.^4,26 However, recent findings suggest that the inactive forms of GLP-1 may have actions similar to that of insulin on the liver, vasculature and heart given the findings from rodent and in vitro studies.^200,201 Therefore, the “inactive forms” may not be inactive and act on signalling pathways that are currently unidentified. This is a plausible explanation since evolution is very unlikely to develop such an ATP wasteful response. It has even been indicated that all GLP-1 released by L-cells is inactivated before it reaches the pancreas and that GLP-1 mediated insulin release is induced by local paracrine actions in the islets during the postprandial period, and there is emerging evidence that this is the case, which would mean that GLP-1 released by L-cells only acts on its receptor (GLP-1R) expressed on nerve terminals of neighboring vagal afferents, conveying signalling to the solitary nucleus of the hindbrain to promote satiety, delay gastric emptying and suppress hepatic glucose production.^107,202 The physiological relevance of GLP-1 metabolites remains an area of controversy.²⁰³

GLP-1 Targets and Effects

GLP-1 mediates its effects via its receptor GLP-1R, which is a GPCR consisting of 463aa.²⁶ GLP-1R expression occurs in not only the pancreas alpha and beta-cells but also GIT, cardiovascular system, kidney, lung and the central and peripheral nervous system.^11,107 The signalling pathways coupled to GLP-1R activation vary in different tissues, which generates the desired physiological effects in each tissue.¹⁰⁷ GLP-1 also affects organs indirectly by potentiating insulin secretion. It accounts for ~28% of the total postprandial insulin released into circulation.^17,108

Pancreatic Islet Alpha- and Beta-Cells

Since GLP-1 analogues play a vital role in the treatment of T2D, the ability of this hormone to mediate the incretin effect is its most studied and most clinically relevant action.^32,109,112 GLP-1 analogues effectively reduce hyperglycaemia in patients as they have a much longer half-life than native GLP-1, prolonging the incretin effect in patients.^32,112 The ability of GLP-1 to stimulate insulin secretion is dependent on high glucose levels, as this hormone does not induce insulin secretion in the presence of low blood glucose.¹¹ Additionally, GLP-1R activation also induces the translocation to the nucleus of the PDX-1 transcription factor, giving GLP-1 a role in islet beta-cell survival.^112,204,205 Interestingly, chronic liraglutide administration to diabetic mice that had been injected with alloxan prevented the loss of beta-cell mass, which was shown to be due to both an increase in beta-cell proliferation and a decrease in apoptosis.²⁰⁶ Liraglutide treatment was also demonstrated to inhibit beta-cell apoptosis in isolated human pancreatic beta-cells, and after 24 hours, the islet beta-cell proliferation rate tripled.²⁰⁷ In streptozocin-induced type 1 diabetic rats and isolated human pancreatic ducts, exendin-4 administration was also demonstrated to increase the population of islet beta-cells.²⁰⁸ Endogenous GLP-1 has also been suggested to promote beta-cell proliferation in rodent cell lines and isolated rodent islet cells in addition to inducing apoptotic resistance.^205,209 Additionally, activation of GLP-1R has been demonstrated to promote cell survival during glucotoxic and lipotoxic conditions, excessive nitric oxide levels, Ca²⁺ depletion, oxidative stress, and cytokine-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in primary beta-cells and cell lines.^210–214

Recently, GLP-1 action has additionally been expanded to potential regulation of autophagy in islet beta-cells: Exendin-4 induced autophagy in INS-1E cells and isolated human islets during chronic exposure to excess nutrients, by promotion of autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion.^215,216 Exendin-4 was also demonstrated to increase lysosomal function in another study, whereby autophagosome clearance in a rat model of tacrolimus-induced diabetes was increased, promoting cell survival given that autophagosome accumulation causes intracellular damage.²¹⁷ Additionally, in this study, in vivo exendin-4 treatment also decreased tacrolimus-induced hyperglycemia, oxidative stress, and apoptosis further demonstrating mechanisms by which exendin-4 promotes cell survival. Interestingly, recent studies have found that chronic GLP-1R activation results in enhanced ATP production and upregulation of glycolytic enzymes which increases the potential of ATP production anaerobically.²¹⁸ It has been postulated that the ability of GLP-1 to enhance metabolism may decrease endoplasmic reticulum stress via increasing mitochondrial production of ATP and Ca²⁺, which could be utilised for assisting endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis.²⁰⁵ Interestingly, chronic GLP-1R activation activates distinct signalling pathways; GLP-1R agonist treatment induced insulin-like growth factor-2 secretion and promoted expression of its receptor, which has been suggested to enhance the pro-survival actions of GLP-1 in islet beta-cells.^205,219,220 Given that endoplasmic reticulum stress, impaired autophagy and proliferation, and increased apoptosis are all suggested to promote islet beta-cell pathology in T2D, and the findings that GLP-1R activation can influence all of these give GLP-1 and its analogues a role beyond just enhancing insulin secretion.²⁰⁵

GLP-1 has also been shown to reduce blood glucose levels via direct inhibition of glucagon secretion from islet alpha-cells in an insulin-independent manner. However, the underlying mechanism for GLP-1 accomplishing this is not known, as whether or not GLP-1R is localised to the islet alpha-cell surface is a matter of debate.¹⁰⁸ The strongest evidence that demonstrates GLP-1’s ability to directly inhibit glucagon secretion comes from the observation that the ability of T1D patients to secrete glucagon is suppressed after GLP-1 infusion and glycaemic control is improved.²²¹ GLP-1 is however known to indirectly inhibit glucagon release through the insulin section it induces.²²² Recently, a study found that alpha-TC1/6 cells can secrete GLP-1 under hyperglycemic, hyperlipidemic or inflammatory conditions during in vitro experiments, suggesting that this hormone may act locally to influence both islet alpha- and beta-cell behaviour during pathological conditions.²²³ Although, there is evidence to suggest that islet alpha-cells can secrete GLP-1 during healthy circumstances and that this secretion becomes elevated during diabetic/disease conditions, whether these cells secrete GLP-1 and the physiological relevance of this remains unclear.²²⁴ Interestingly, another study found that liraglutide treatment was shown to increase alpha-cell GLP-1 expression in a beta-cell GLP-1R-dependent manner in human islets.²²⁵ This implies that GLP-1 can induce alpha-cells to produce GLP-1 via indirect mechanisms. Despite the debated GLP-1R expression in islet alpha-cells, recent studies have provided evidence that GLP-1R agonists may mediate direct effects on alpha-cells via GLP-1R action.^11,226,227 Islet alpha-cell GLP-1R knockout mice were unable to inhibit glucagon secretion at high glucose levels, and surprisingly, these mice exhibited reduced glucagon secretion during low glucose conditions.²²⁷ A recent study also found that that glucagon’s ability to induce insulin secretion was reduced in isolated islets from GLP-1R knockout mice, and in wild-type mice a GLP-1R antagonist significantly reduced glucagon-induced insulin secretion.¹²¹ These data suggest that GLP-1 receptors contribute to the insulinotropic action of glucagon via GLP-1R signalling. An additional recent study found that GLP-1 action on human pancreatic islet alpha-cells was mediated independently of any paracrine signalling, as preventing insulin and somatostatin signalling did not affect the inhibition of glucagon secretion.²²⁶ Determining whether GLP-1 has direct/indirect effects on islet alpha-cells and what receptor(s) mediate these actions requires further investigation.

Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) and Food Intake

In the GIT, GLP-1 reduces gastric motility, inhibits postprandial gastric acid secretion, decreases postprandial pancreatic exocrine secretion and reduces smooth muscle activity in the small intestine,¹⁹³ promoting a slower digestion of nutrients from the GIT.¹⁰⁷ These effects all result in a slower and steadier uptake of nutrients into the circulation; preventing hyperglycaemia and the requirement of a fast and aggressive insulin response.^11,107 Thus, GLP-1 also plays an important role in the digestion process (this may be the major action of short-acting GLP-1RAs such as lixisenatide) as well as potentiating the incretin effect. It has been demonstrated that the inhibitory action of GLP-1 on the GIT is mediated through a vagal pathway.²²⁸ Subsequently, evidence of the ileal-brake activity of GLP-1 was further provided using the GLP-1R antagonist exendin_9-39.²²⁹ GLP-1 has also been shown to induce satiety, although how it does so mechanistically has not yet been determined.^107,230 It was initially postulated that GLP-1’s effect on appetite may be induced by its ability to reduce gut motility; however, it has been shown that GLP-1 has direct effects on certain neurons in the hypothalamus.¹⁹³ GLP-1 is expressed in neurons of the brainstem and GLP-1R is present in the hypothalamic regions that regulate energy homeostasis and appetite.^11,107 Intracerebroventricular injection of GLP-1 induces satiety in rats, and this is reversed by exendin_9–39 demonstrating that GLP-1 mediates its actions via its receptor here.^231,232

Studies found that intracerebroventricular administration of GLP-1 in rodents can mediate satiety with no food present in the GIT and when gastric emptying is prevented; therefore, in rodents, GLP-1 induces satiety by its actions on caudal brainstem neurons.^11,107,193 The mechanisms which enable peripheral GLP-1 to induce satiety are not understood, but it is thought that GLP-1 binding to GLP-1R on neurons in the GIT, hepatoportal bed and CNS regulate this effect.^107,233 The varying weight loss observed for the different GLP-1 analogues currently used for T2D treatment has been suggested to be due to their ability to penetrate the CNS.^196,199 It is plausible that GLP-1 directly decreases appetite, as this would allow ingested nutrients to be digested and prevent hyperglycaemia/hyperlipidaemia or undesirable nutrient storage by more ingestion of nutrients. It is now widely accepted that liraglutide therapy effectively promotes weight loss in obese individuals with/without T2D by reducing food intake via direct action on neurons in the brain.²³⁴ In recent years, both liraglutide and semaglutide have been approved in the USA to treat obesity given their ability to induce weight loss to a greater extent than other drug options and exhibit superior safety, and in both diabetic and non-diabetic individuals liraglutide and semaglutide have been recommended as the first-line drugs for obesity treatment.²³⁵

Cardiovascular System

During the 1990s, several cell types in the human cardiovascular system were found to express GLP-1R, such as vascular smooth muscle, cardiomyocytes, endocardium, and coronary endothelium/smooth muscle.¹¹ Intravenous administration of GLP-1 has been reported to mediate multiple cardiovascular beneficial effects in animal models: improved left ventricular contractility, increased functional recovery and cardiomyocyte viability, reduced myocardial infarction, reduced atherosclerotic lesions, improved endothelial function, improved blood flow and decreased hypertension.^11,107 In diabetic and non-diabetic humans with cardiovascular pathology such as coronary heart disease, recombinant native GLP-1 treatment has induced several cardiovascular benefits including reduced arrhythmias, improved left ventricular function, and improved endothelial function.^236,237 Several studies using animal models have demonstrated that acute GLP-1 infusion increased heart rate, blood pressure and glucose uptake by the heart, whereas chronic GLP-1R agonism in rodents reduced blood pressure and prevented hypertension.^11,107,238 These findings imply that GLP-1 mediates direct effects on the heart. Short-term human clinical trials demonstrated that acute GLP-1 therapy either increased heart rate and blood pressure or did not affect these.^11,238

GLP-1 analogue and DPP-IV inhibition therapies decreased circulatory lipid levels in healthy and diabetic rodents, and similar therapies also produced the same effects on T2D patients.^197,238,239 However, one study demonstrated that 24 weeks of exenatide administration did not influence lipid levels.²⁴⁰ Rodent and human studies have produced evidence that GLP-1 therapies have antiatherosclerotic and angiogenic effects, and these therapies hindered the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy.^11,241,242 Long-term human studies demonstrated that chronic DPP-IV inhibition did not significantly mediate any cardiovascular (CV) benefits.^243,244 However, chronic GLP-1-based therapies demonstrated several CV benefits in diabetic patients, as liraglutide and exenatide therapies decreased all-cause mortality.²³⁸ Liraglutide mediated a significant decrease in CV mortality whereas exenatide reduced nonfatal stroke in diabetic patients. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of seven clinical trials found that GLP-1R agonist treatment reduces major adverse cardiovascular events by 12% overall in type 2 diabetic patients.²⁴⁵ The recent findings of the SELECT study also indicate the therapeutic potential of GLP-1 receptor analogues to improve cardiovascular outcomes in overweight and obese individuals without T2D, as weekly administered semaglutide was found to be superior to placebo in reducing the incidence of death from cardiovascular disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction and nonfatal stroke.²⁴⁶ Mechanistically, it is unclear how GLP-1-based therapies exert beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system, but studies have suggested that this is achieved by direct (cardiovascular GLP-1R activation) and indirect (promotion of the incretin effect) mechanisms.^11,238

It is also possible that GLP-1 therapies mediate beneficial actions via extra cardiovascular GLP-1 signalling, as one study reported that exendin-4 administration in rat femoral arteries did not affect short-term triglyceride exposure-induced endothelial dysfunction.²⁴⁷ Interestingly, in 2008 a study found that the GLP-1 metabolite GLP-1 (9–36) afforded significant protection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice and induced vasodilation in a GLP-1R independent manner.²⁴⁸ Further, a study conducted in 2010 revealed that treatment of mouse cardiomyocytes with GLP-1 (9–36 amide) resulted in extracellular signal-regulated kinase⁷ phosphorylation, Akt activation and decreased apoptosis caused by hydrogen peroxide stress or hypoxia.²⁴⁹ This study highlights that after GLP-1 has been processed by DPP-IV it may still have physiological functions and is not inactivated as current dogma suggests in humans.

Immune System

Findings from multiple studies have demonstrated that GLP-1 also regulates the immune system.^11,112 In rodents, GLP-1R mRNA is present in several immune cell types: macrophages, Treg cells, thymocytes, splenocytes, bone marrow-derived cells, and natural killer cells etc.¹¹ Administration of GLP-1R agonists to humans or animals with T2D or obesity is usually associated with a reduction in local or systemic inflammation.²⁵⁰ When the GLP-1 analogue liraglutide was administered to patients with psoriasis (an inflammatory disease associated with obesity and diabetes) this led to a decreased psoriasis area severity index, and cytokine secretion was decreased from natural killer cells in a glycaemic control-independent manner.²⁵¹ However, a subsequent study was not able to confirm that liraglutide therapy improved psoriasis prognosis.²⁵² GLP-1 secretion from L-cells increases substantially in response to many cytokines such as interleukin-6, and interestingly, GLP-1 levels are elevated in patients with sepsis and are correlated with the severity of illness and clinical outcomes, although it is currently unclear if the elevation of GLP-1 levels exacerbates or alleviates pathology during sepsis.^253,254

High-fat diet-fed mice treated with exendin-4 (a hormone found in the saliva of the Gila monster which is synthetically modified to produce exenatide for T2D treatment) had decreased mRNA levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3.²⁵⁵ One study highlighted that GLP-1 plays an important role in the immune system: intraperitoneal injections of GLP-1 and gastrin were shown to restore normoglycemia in diabetic NOD mice (a type 1 diabetic mouse model) by increasing the pancreatic beta-cell mass and insulin content, reducing beta-cell apoptosis, and downregulating the autoimmune response.²⁵⁶ In GLP-1R KO mice, the distal gut was found to display microbial dysbiosis and was more sensitive to inflammation-related injury, which was thought to be due to dysregulated inflammation-related gene expression. This was substantially corrected following the transplantation of bone marrow from GLP-1R-positive mice into these GLP-1R knockout mice.²⁵⁷ Multiple studies have demonstrated anti-inflammatory actions, such as reduction of secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines or increase in the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, of GLP-1R agonists,²⁵⁸ which may have future therapeutic applications for both T1D and T2D, as well as inflammatory/autoimmune diseases.

Kidney

In 2004, it was found that GLP-1 mediates effects on the kidney: Healthy and obese individuals treated with GLP-1 exhibited increased sodium excretion, glomerular filtration rate and urinary secretion.²⁵⁹ GLP-1 downregulated Na+/H+ exchanger isoform 3 in the renal proximal tubule of rats, suggesting that GLP-1 could be used to treat hypertension and sodium retention disorders.²⁶⁰ Exendin-4 treatment also enhanced renal function, and reduced inflammation, fibrosis and proteinuria in rat kidneys, and these effects occurred in a glucose-lowering independent manner.²⁶¹ A recent study found that liraglutide therapy resulted in significantly lower rates of renal outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes who were at high cardiovascular risk.²⁶² Multiple clinical studies over the last few years have found that several GLP-1R agonists have beneficial effects on diabetic kidney disease independent of their glucose-lowering actions mediated by natriuresis, anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative stress properties, and suppression of renal fibrosis.²⁶³ Moreover, several studies have reported that GLP-1R agonists improve renal outcomes, especially in T2D patients who are at high risk of cardiovascular disease.^245,264 The findings from all these studies suggest that GLP-1 improves kidney function and mediates protective effects on the kidney, meaning that it is a promising therapeutic option for diabetic kidney disease. However, further research is required to establish how to use these drugs to produce optimal outcomes for kidney pathology.²⁶³ The outcomes of the currently ongoing FLOW study will further inform the therapeutic potential of GLP-1R analogues to improve renal and cardiovascular prognosis in patients with renal impairment and T2D.^265,266

Nervous System

GLP-1 has also been reported to affect the nervous system.¹¹ Lateral ventricular administration of GLP-1 or exendin-4 in mice reduced endogenous levels of amyloid beta-protein (a protein that promotes Alzheimer’s disease), and infusion of GLP-1 and exendin-4 into rat hippocampal neurons also prevented cell death induced by amyloid-beta protein.²⁶⁷ GLP-1 administration to intracerebroventricular tissue improved hippocampal synaptic plasticity and reversed impairment in long-term potentiation induced by amyloid-beta protein, which was subsequently administered.²⁶⁸ One human study found that liraglutide therapy was found to increase cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.³² In Parkinson’s disease, nigrostriatal neurons undergo cell death and GLP-1R is expressed in these neurons.¹¹ Therefore, the undesirable GLP-1R activity could promote the pathology associated with Parkinson’s disease, or future therapeutic options may be able to regulate GLP-1R actions to delay or prevent the manifestation of this disease. Recent clinical studies have found that exenatide therapy was found to induce long-lasting improvements in motor and cognitive function in patients with Parkinson’s’ disease.^269,270 GLP-1 or exendin-4 treatment of cultured rat embryonic cerebral cortical cells promoted cell survival during hypoxic injury, and this effect was blocked by GLP-1R antagonists and not seen in GLP-1R knockout mice.²⁷¹ Exendin-4 also promoted apoptotic resistance and improved viability in NSC19 neuronal cells (a mouse cell line) during oxidative stress.²⁷² Liraglutide was also shown to promote SH-SY5Y cell survival by shifting cell fate from apoptosis to survival under chronic stress conditions.²⁵²

Additionally, a recent study found that GLP-1 treatment improves learning and memory in type 2 diabetic rats.²⁶² All of these findings suggest that GLP-1 mediates neuroprotective and neurotrophic actions. Interestingly, a triple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonist was found to have neuroprotective effects on a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, as drug treatment increased neurogenesis and reversed memory deficit.²⁷⁰ Additionally, tri-agonist treatment resulted in apoptosis, synaptic loss, inflammation, amyloid levels and oxidative stress being reduced. How peripherally administered GLP-1 induces satiety mechanistically is unclear, but it is postulated that signals being generated by the binding of GLP-1 to its receptor on neurons in the GIT, hepatoportal bed and CNS mediate this effect.^32,107,233 Interestingly, in contrast to this, a recent study concluded that central and peripheral GLP-1 systems suppress eating via independent gut-brain circuits in mice.²⁷³ The reported variation in the weight loss for the different GLP-1 analogues currently used to treat T2D is possibly related to their ability to penetrate the CNS, allowing for central GLP-1R binding.^196,199 Given the controversy regarding the ability of GLP-1-based therapies in dementia treatment due to varying findings in multiple studies, especially in human studies, the future of these therapies to treat neurological disease is currently unclear.³² A recent study clearly demonstrated the therapeutic potential of GLP-1R agonists in dementia treatment, as T2D patients treated with these agonists had reduced incidence of dementia compared to placebo.²⁷⁴

Muscle, Adipose Tissue and Liver

Given the ability of GLP-1 to promote the incretin effect,^11,107 this hormone has indirect actions on tissues such as skeletal muscle, adipose tissue and the liver through insulin- insulin acts as a “second messenger” of GLP-1. Therefore, GLP-1 indirectly promotes glucose uptake and storage in adipose tissue (excess glucose is stored as fat), skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle.^4,26 Additionally, GLP-1, through the insulin secretion it induces, also promotes glycogen synthesis and inhibits gluconeogenesis in the liver, and also increases fat storage in adipocytes.^4,26 Findings from certain studies suggest that GLP-1 has direct effects on the liver, adipose tissue and skeletal muscle and whether GLP-1R is expressed in these tissues is currently debated.^11,107 GLP-1 was found to be able to bind to rat hepatocyte cell membranes, which resulted in increased inhibition of gluconeogenesis and enhanced glycogen synthesis after insulin release.^275,276 One study found that GLP-1R is expressed in human hepatocytes obtained from liver biopsies, and treatment with GLP-1 analogues enhanced insulin sensitivity and fatty-acid catabolism, suggesting that these analogues could improve hepatic insulin resistance in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.²⁷⁷ A more recent study found that GLP-1R expression was increased in hepatocytes from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis liver samples in comparison to healthy livers, implying that GLP-1R signalling plays a role in liver pathology.²⁷⁸ In strips of human skeletal muscle, GLP-1 promoted glycogen synthesis and inhibited glycogen phosphorylase activity- comparable findings were generated with L6 myotubes treated with GLP-1, as insulin-stimulated glycogen synthesis was increased.^279–281 Interestingly, in mice, it was shown that GLP-1 secretion is increased during exercise and that overexpression of GLP-1 in mouse skeletal muscle enhanced endurance and glycogen synthesis.²⁸² It has also been suggested that GLP-1 has synergistic effects on adipocytes with insulin, as basal and acute insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was enhanced by GLP-1 and exendin-4 in differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes.^283–285 A study found that liraglutide therapy in mice decreased visceral fat, which is associated with metabolic diseases, and relatively increased subcutaneous fat, with lipogenesis being suppressed or enhanced, respectively. The expression of browning-related genes was upregulated in subcutaneous white adipose tissue in this study.²⁸⁶ These observations imply that GLP-1R signalling can redistribute body fat and promote browning remodelling in white adipose tissue, which may have clinical relevance. However, several studies found that GLP-1 did not enhance insulin actions in humans.¹⁰⁷ Further, a study found that after T2D patients had bariatric surgery, GLP-1R expression in adipose tissue did not affect metabolic outcomes such as insulin sensitivity improvement, T2D remission and weight loss.²⁸⁷ Therefore, it is a matter of debate currently whether GLP-1 enhances the insulin actions on adipocytes, liver and skeletal muscle. If GLP-1 does enhance insulin actions and/or mediates direct effects in these tissues then the receptor(s)/mechanisms that mediate these effects are currently unclear.

Bone

It has been elucidated that GLP-1 also influences bone metabolism.¹²⁰ GLP-1R-deficient mice exhibit cortical osteopenia, bone fragility, increased osteoclastic numbers and enhanced bone resorption activity.²⁸⁸ GLP-1 indirectly affects bone by upregulating calcitonin, which in turn inhibits bone resorption.^120,289 However, one study reported that exendin-4 induced bone formation in rats.²⁹⁰ Whether GLP-1-based therapies have any beneficial effects on bone metabolism in humans is currently elusive/unclear.²⁹¹ However, the large cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1R agonists have not found any obvious effects of these therapies on bone.^292–294

Lung

Currently, it is thought that GLP-1 has no direct effects on the lungs, but this is an area of ongoing research.^11,107 One study found that GLP-1 increased macromolecule secretion from neuroendocrine cells in the lungs.²⁹⁵ More recent studies have found that GLP-1R agonists can improve lung function in patients/animals with lung pathology and could be a new treatment for patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma.^296,297 However, the large cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1R agonists have not found any obvious effects of GLP-1 therapies on the lung.^292–294 Further research is needed into the effects of GLP-1R agonists on lung function.

GLP-1R Knockout Mice

Studies investigating the effect of GLP-1R knockout/inactivation have generated some interesting observations. In 1996, GLP-1R knockout mice were first developed and it was found that they exhibit increased levels of blood glucose following oral glucose challenge in association with a reduction in levels of circulating insulin.²⁹⁸ However, studies have subsequently generated conflicting findings as to whether glucose tolerance is normal or impaired in these mice.²⁹⁹ Interestingly, intracerebroventricular administration of GLP-1 did not inhibit feeding in GLP-1R knockout mice but did in wild-type mice, suggesting that GLP-1R signalling mediates satiety, although no evidence for abnormal body weight or feeding behaviour was reported in GLP-1R knockout mice. In 2014, Ussher and colleagues inactivated GLP-1R in adult mouse cardiomyocytes and unexpectedly found that liraglutide administration after left anterior descending (LAD) artery occlusion induced increased heart rate and survival in these mice, although there was no difference in survival/adaptive responses or left ventricular remodelling following LAD coronary artery occlusion between GLP-1R inactivated and control mice that were not treated with any GLP-1R agonist.³⁰⁰ However, the basal 24h heart rate was significantly lower in GLP-1R inactivated mice. This implies that GLP-1R is required for the control of heart rate in mice in the absence of pathology, but endogenous cardiomyocyte GLP-1R activity is not required for both adaptive responses to ischemic or cardiomyopathic injury and GLP-1 analogue-induced cardioprotection or enhanced chronotropic activity.

Another study was able to successfully knock down GLP-1R expression in mice islet beta-cells by 70–80% which resulted in these mice having elevated fasting glucose plasma levels, but normal islet expression of insulin and proglucagon mRNA transcripts.³⁰¹ Strikingly, GSIS and oral glucose tolerance were normal in these mice, and GLP-1 levels were not altered but interestingly GIP levels were decreased. Evidence was also provided from this study that GLP-1 controls glucose tolerance by extrapancreatic means, as GLP-1R antagonist administration increased plasma glucose levels in these mice during an oral glucose tolerance test. Intraperitoneal GLP-1 was shown to lower plasma glucose in GLP-1R knockdown mice without increasing insulin secretion, whereas intravenous GLP-1 did not affect glucose or insulin levels. Interestingly, one study found that GLP-1R knockout mice were protected from high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and had enhanced insulin-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose uptake, and these mice also exhibited enhanced action of insulin on hepatocytes as well as decreased hepatic and skeletal muscle triglyceride accumulation.³⁰² A recent study found that the insulin response to intravenous glucagon was preserved in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice but that glucagon’s insulinotropic actions were suppressed in isolated islets from GLP-1 receptor knockout mice.¹²¹ Additionally, in wild-type mice, the GLP-1 receptor antagonist substantially suppressed glucagon-induced insulin secretion. These data suggest that GLP-1 receptors contribute to the insulinotropic action of glucagon and that in GLP-1R knockout mice there is some extrapancreatic mechanism that compensates for the loss of glucagon-induced insulin secretion via GLP-1R. Interestingly, GLP-1R knockout mice were reported to exhibit similar or increased insulin secretion compared to wild-type mice in response to glucose loads, with glucose tolerance maintained in a recent study.²⁹⁹ From the observations in this study it seems that GLP-1R knockout mice adapt to the absence of GLP-1R, and are able to maintain glucose tolerance and desirable plasma insulin levels in response to glucose challenges. Figure 6 summarises the targets and actions of GLP-1.

Figure 6 An overview of the effects/possible effects that GLP-1 has on various organs after it has been secreted into the circulation from L-cells of the gut in response to nutrient ingestion. Organs highlighted in blue are not known to express GLP-1R but GLP-1 has been demonstrated to mediate insulin-like effects on these tissues during experimental settings- it is, however, correct to state that GLP-1 does have indirect effects on these organs in humans due to its ability to promote the incretin effect. GLP-1R mRNA has been detected in immune cells and GLP-1 has been shown to regulate the immune system (highlighted in red) activity during experimental settings. GLP-1 has also been shown to influence bone (highlighted green) metabolism in rodents but the effects of GLP-1 on human bone are currently elusive. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.11,26,107,108,112,120,191

In summary, GLP-1 and GLP-1R show expression in a variety of tissues and the best-studied and most currently clinically relevant effects of GLP-1 is its ability to act as an incretin hormone and reduce appetite, given the global prevalence of T2D and obesity.26,32 Even though the effects of GLP-1 on other tissues are not well characterised, it is becoming increasingly clear that this hormone does have physiological effects on a variety of tissues throughout the body, and a better understanding of the extrapancreatic effects of GLP-1 may have future therapeutic potential for diseases other than T2D.¹¹

GIP

GIP is a 42aa-long hormone produced by K cells of the upper small intestine.^120,303 The preproGIP gene, which is located on chromosome 17q21.3–q22, consists of 6 exons. After preproGIP (153aa long) is produced, it undergoes proteolytic processing to produce GIP.¹²⁰ GIP levels, similar to GLP-1 levels, increase after nutrient ingestion: fasting levels in the blood range from 5–20pM and this increases to 50–100pM after glucose ingestion and 100–150pM after ingestion of mixed nutrients.^304,305 Recently, experimental evidence has emerged that the nervous system may also regulate GIP secretion as galanin was shown to be able to inhibit both murine GLP-1 and GIP secretion by acting on its receptor expressed in L and K cells, respectively.³⁰⁶ GIP is not as potent as GLP-1 and has a longer half-life of ~5 minutes, but it is also inactivated by DPP-IV enzymes in circulation.^11,120,307 GIP, to date, is thought to mediate its insulinotropic effects after binding to GIPR via similar intracellular pathways to GLP-1.¹²⁰ GIPR activation results in ~42% of postprandial insulin secretion.^17,119 GIPR knockout mice have impaired tolerance to oral glucose load but not to intraperitoneal glucose injection, confirming the importance of GIP in mice and its dependence on its receptor to mediate the incretin effect.³⁰⁸ Interestingly, GIP has also been shown to have anti-apoptotic and proliferative effects on islet beta-cells during in vivo and in vitro studies, as it has been shown to activate mitogen-stimulated protein kinase pathways.¹²⁰ It has not been established if GIP actives PDX-1 similarly to GLP-1, but the current consensus in the literature is that GIP and GLP-1 activate both similar pathways and different pathways to promote their anti-apoptotic and proliferative effects.^120,209 Figure 7 summarises how GIP and GLP-1 binding to their receptors promotes the incretin effect.

Figure 7 An overview of the processes in islet beta-cells that mediate incretin-induced insulin secretion. Glucose entry into islet beta-cells from the blood circulation via GLUT2 undergoes catabolism to raise ATP levels, which then induce the closure of ATP-sensitive potassium channels, causing membrane depolarisation and subsequent calcium influx. The resulting calcium influx then triggers insulin secretion. The binding of GLP-1 and GIP, which are secreted from the intestine into the circulation in response to nutrient ingestion, to GLP-1R and GIPR, respectively, enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion by initiating cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) production via activation of adenylyl cyclase by Gα, which, in turn, activates protein kinase A (PKA) and exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac). PKA and Epac further promote potassium channel closure which indirectly assists with extracellular calcium influx. Also, Epac directly induces calcium release from the endoplasmic reticulum, whereas PKA is thought to increase the permeability of calcium channels to enable a more rapid influx of calcium. The now elevated intracellular calcium levels further enhance the exocytosis of insulin vesicles. GLP-1R activation also induces transcription of the preproinsulin, glucokinase and GLUT2 genes allowing for further insulin production, glucose catabolism and glucose uptake, respectively, via activation of the PDX-1 transcription factor and its translocation to the nucleus. PDX-1 activation also induces transcription of genes involved in proliferation, neogenesis and apoptotic resistance. Additionally, GLP-1R activation promotes intracellular lipid catabolism which is thought to provide the mitochondria with more metabolic fuel to further raise the ATP/ADP ratio- ATP is needed for both phases of insulin secretion. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.11,55,107,112,120,191

There are more prominent differences between these 2 hormones’ effects on islet alpha-cells: the effects of GLP-1 and GIP on glucagon secretion are opposite.120 GIP infusion was first shown to promote glucagon secretion in the 1970s, as this resulted in counteracting glucagon suppression induced by glucose in rats.³⁰⁹ Similar observations were obtained from healthy humans during euglycemia and T2D patients during meal-tolerance studies.^310,311 Given GIP’s ability to promote glucagon secretion, it has been considered inappropriate to use clinically to treat T2D as it would amplify the hyperglycaemia associated with this disease.¹²⁰ Additionally, islet beta-cells become irresponsive to GIP in T2D.^11,312 Currently, there, therefore, seems a minimal clinical benefit of using GIP analogues in T2D treatment. Given GIP’s clear ability to act as the most important incretin hormone, it is surprising that it also augments glucagon secretion. It seems very unlikely that the glucagon released by GIPR activation counteracts the incretin effect, as this would result in a counterproductive postprandial response that would not promote metabolic homeostasis in the individual. There must be a currently unidentified physiological beneficial effect of GIP’s ability to promote glucagon release in response to postprandial nutrient loads. Interestingly, GIP has been shown to stimulate glucagon secretion even with high glucose in T2D patients, which implies that inappropriate GIP/GIPR activity contributes to the T2D disease phenotype.³¹³ It has been shown that fatty acids strongly enhance GIP secretion, and this hormone then subsequently plays an important role in mediating fat uptake into adipose tissue.^314,315

GIPR has been detected in adipose tissue and genetic ablation of GIPR in mice has clearly shown the importance that GIP has on fat uptake: GIPR-deficient mice did not develop weight gain and adiposity to the same degree as control mice even though they were on the same high-fat diets.³¹⁶ Interestingly, the GIPR-deficient mice had increased oxygen consumption and respiratory quotient indicating that they used the excess fat to generate ATP.^317,318 Further evidence that GIPR-deficient mice catabolised the excess fat is provided by the observation that these mice had enhanced adiponectin secretion, which induces fat oxidation in muscle and raises the respiratory quotient.³¹⁷ Genetic ablation of GIPR in leptin-deficient obese (ob/ob) mice was shown to ameliorate insulin insensitivity and obesity by increasing energy expenditure without significantly affecting insulin secretion.³¹⁶ These observations were confirmed in ob/ob mice and high-fat-fed mice when they were treated with a GIPR antagonist, and also in mice lacking GIP-secreting K cells, confirming the important role of GIP in fat accumulation.^319,320 Although GIP is known to increase the activity of lipoprotein lipase, an enzyme that promotes the uptake of fats from the circulation into adipocytes for storage, it has not been well elucidated mechanistically how GIPR activation promotes this.¹²⁰ In humans, higher serum fasting GIP concentrations were associated with an unhealthy body fat distribution independent of plasma insulin concentration, and genome-wide association studies found associations between body mass index, body fat distribution and increased visceral fat accumulation with single nucleotide polymorphisms of the GIPR locus.³²¹ GIPR is downregulated in adipose tissue during insulin-resistant states, such as obesity, and several studies suggest that GIP augments insulin actions in adipose tissue.^322,323 Interestingly, one study found that GIPs ability to augment insulin actions on adipose tissue was blunted in human adipocytes from obese but not lean individuals.³²² Hence, loss of GIPR signalling may play a role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and the manifestation of obesity.

GIP also has important effects on bone formation.¹²⁰ GIPR has been detected in bone tissue, and ovariectomy-induced bone loss was shown to be suppressed by GIP administration.³²⁴

The importance of endogenous GIP was then demonstrated by the effect of GIPR deficiency in mice: these mice had thinner bone trabeculae resembling that observed in osteoporosis.³²⁵ The number of osteoclasts was increased in GIPR-deficient mice and in vitro studies have shown that GIP suppresses the apoptosis of osteoblasts.¹²⁰ GIP transgenic mice have displayed enhanced bone formation mediated through the suppression of osteoclasts and prevention of osteoblast apoptosis by GIP.³²⁶ GIP may also promote calcium uptake into bone tissue from circulation as postprandial plasma calcium levels are increased in GIPR-deficient mice.³²⁴ Over recent years, studies have found that GIP treatment in humans reduces bone resorption, with one study also finding that this hormone additionally increases the rate of bone formation.^327–329 A recent study also found that GIP reduced human osteoclast activity and osteoblast survival during in vitro experiments.³³⁰ Hence, GIPR activation-based therapies may have the potential for bone pathology treatment. Recent rodent studies have also generated evidence suggesting that GIP action through GIPR lowers body weight and food intake via central neuronal signalling, given that these effects weren’t observed in CNS-GIPR knockout mice.^331,332 Further, the GLP-1/GIP dual-agonist tested in this study, MAR709, lost its superior efficacy on body weight and food intake over GLP-1 in the CNS-GIPR knockout mice, suggesting that this dual-agonist mediates part of its action via the CNS-GIPR. GIPR expression has been detected in several cell types in the human hypothalamus and studies show that GIPR signaling can enhance satiety.^332,333 Figure 8 summarises the direct effects of GIP in tissues that express GIPR.

Figure 8 A summary of the direct effects that GIP has on various organs expressing GIPR upon its release during the postprandial period. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.119,120,308–311,314,315,317,321,325,330–334

Double Incretin Receptor Knockout (DIRKO) Mice

DIRKO mice have normal body weight and do not have improved glycaemic response following exogenous administration of GIP or the GLP-1R agonist exendin-4.335 The hypoglycaemic response to exogenous insulin was normal in these mice. However, GSIS was decreased following oral but not intraperitoneal glucose administration in DIRKO compared to mice with just one of these receptors knocked out. This demonstrates how the incretin hormones are dependent on their receptor being present on islet beta-cells to mediate their insulinotropic effects. A subsequent study showed that single and dual incretin receptor knockout mice have impaired insulin secretion after high-fat feeding, but glucose control was only moderately altered due to maintained insulin sensitivity.³³⁶ Interestingly, DIRKO mice also exhibit increased energy expenditure which demonstrates that incretin hormone action may negatively regulate nutrient catabolism. Another study also found that DIRKO mice had reduced insulin secretion but enhanced insulin action and that these mice were protected from high-fat diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance further supporting the notion that incretin hormone action may negatively regulate nutrient catabolism.³³⁷ Interestingly, wild-type mice exhibited hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in response to high-fat feeding but this was not observed in DIRKO mice.

In summary, both GIP and GLP-1 mediate the incretin effect but there is continuing emerging evidence that these hormones modulate physiological responses in extrapancreatic organs.^11,120 Knocking out or inhibiting the action of one or both of the incretin receptors results in some expected and unexpected phenotypes.¹²⁰ An unexpected phenotype produced by GIPR deficient ob/ob mice was that they lost weight by increasing their energy expenditure, which is surprising as their insulin levels were not significantly altered in comparison to control mice, and therefore their energy expenditure should have been similar to control mice.³³⁶

Tri-Agonist for GLP-1R, GIPR and GCGR

Recently, a triple agonist for GLP-1R, GIPR and GCGR was developed and tested on diet-induced obese mice.³³⁸ The tri-agonist lowered body weight in diet-induced obese mice by 26.6% after 20 days of treatment, whereas the GLP-1R/GIPR coagonist lowered body weight by 15.7%, and it was found that the action of the tri-agonist occurred in a dose-dependent manner. Both the GLP-1R/GIP coagonist and the tri-agonist similarly reduced blood glucose levels and improved glucose tolerance without induction of hypoglycaemia, and this demonstrates that chronic GCGR agonism does not overpower the anti-hyperglycemic effects of GLP-1R and GIPR activation. Surprisingly, tri-agonist treatment lowered plasma insulin levels to a greater extent than the GLP-1R/GIP coagonist, which may indicate greater insulin sensitivity. Chronic GCGR activation should increase plasma glucose levels and insulin levels would then need to rise to promote normoglycaemia during tri-agonist treatment, but this is not the case. Interestingly, no difference in food intake was observed between wild-type mice treated with the dual incretin GLP-1/GIP coagonist and those treated with the tri-agonist despite the difference in weight loss, and this was found to be due to significantly higher ATP expenditure in tri-agonist-treated diet-induced obese mice. The potential of the tri-agonist and the dual incretin GLP-1/GIP coagonist to antagonise the manifestation of spontaneous diabetes was examined in mouse models of T2D.

The tri-agonist treatment prevented excessive weight gain in vehicle-treated mice to a greater degree than the GLP-1/GIP coagonist, and this observation was not due to any alterations in cumulative food intake. The observations here from both the tri-agonist and coagonist treatments are interesting, as numerous studies have indicated that GIPR activation results in weight gain, not weight loss.³³⁹ The tri-agonist also protected these mice from fasting hyperglycaemia to a greater extent than the coagonist. Interestingly, the tri-agonist also preserved the islet architecture by significantly reducing alpha-cell infiltration into the core of pancreatic islets. Glycaemic improvements were maintained in Zucker diabetic fatty rats 3 weeks after treatment cessation even though they had gained body weight and were similar in mass to vehicle-treated controls, demonstrating that the tri-agonist delays T2D progression in rodent models of spontaneous diabetes. This study also demonstrated that the effects of the tri-agonist are dependent on an excess of nutrient storage as weight and food intake were not altered in lean mice even after chronic treatment with the tri-agonist. Another recent study,³⁴⁰ which examined the impacts of another GLP-1, GIP and GCGR tri-agonist in rodents, found that treatment with this agonist decreased body weight, food intake and hyperglycaemia. Additionally, this agonist ameliorated diabetic nephropathy-related diseases in this study. These findings suggest that GLP-1, GIP and GCGR tri-agonists have the therapeutic potential to alleviate diabetic post-diagnosis complications and provide more efficacious treatments for patients. A recent study found that the triple agonist retatrutide for GLP-1R, GIPR and GCGR substantially induced weight loss in obese adults, demonstrating the clinical potential of this triple agonist for obesity treatment.³⁴¹ Another triple agonist for these receptors, LY3437943, was found to induce robust reductions in plasma glucose and bodyweight in overweight individuals with T2D demonstrating this triple agonist could be a future therapeutic option for T2D treatment.³⁴²

Future Perspectives

This review has attempted to summarise the complexity of the regulation of metabolic homeostasis by discussing the known/speculative actions of the incretin hormones and the metabolic hormones that are produced by the pancreatic islets. It is correct to state that many of the hormones involved in metabolism influence each other’s action by both indirect and direct mechanisms to promote metabolic homeostasis, as discussed in this review. The GLP-1R agonists appear a promising more efficacious pharmacological treatment option for obesity given the success of liraglutide and semaglutide, and hopefully in the future clinical trials will investigate the ability of the other relevant agonists to induce weight loss in obese individuals with/without diabetes.²³⁵ Studies have demonstrated that GLP-1 mediates several beneficial extrapancreatic actions on both tissues which either express GLP-1R or do not,¹¹ and clinical trials have found that some GLP-1-mimetic-based therapies alleviate T2D-associated cardiovascular diseases.²³⁸ This suggests that GLP-1R agonists could alleviate the systemic extrapancreatic pathology associated with T2D,^343–345 and have more clinical relevance than just improving insulin secretion in patients. Table 1 presents the GLP-R agonists currently used in T2D treatment and their reported effects on disease-associated cardiovascular and kidney pathology in long-term human studies.

Table 1 Current GLP-1R agonist used in T2D treatment and their reported effects on cardiovascular and kidney pathology

The conflicting observations between human and animal studies determining how various hormones’ actions regulate metabolic homeostasis, especially GLP-1, demonstrate that the findings from animal studies may have reduced clinical implications. Although this review has covered the activity of many important hormones involved in promoting metabolic homeostasis, many other molecules and hormones such as gastrin and noradrenaline are involved in this process,40 and their role in promoting metabolic homeostasis in healthy individuals and how their activity could become dysfunctional and promote pathology has not been discussed. Interestingly, GLP-1/GIP coagonists have also been reported to have weight and glucose-lowering effects in obese T2D patients despite numerous studies supporting the notion that GIP promotes weight gain/obesity.³³⁹ The additional unexpected observations from the GLP-1, GIP and GCGR tri-agonist studies^338,340 warrant further investigation, as these studies highlight the incomplete understanding of metabolic hormonal synergism, and that further elucidation of this will likely lead to more efficacious treatments for diseases such as T2D. A better understanding of the complex biochemical interactions that regulate metabolic homeostasis in healthy individuals and the altered metabolic phenotype in patients with metabolic disorders will likely lead to the development of more efficacious treatments. The outcomes of the ongoing FLOW study will yield further insight into the potential of GLP-1 action-based therapies to alleviate pathology associated with obesity and T2D.²⁶⁶

Conclusion

In conclusion, the regulation of metabolic homeostasis is a multifactorial, complex process, with the synergistic activity of the incretin effect and the pancreatic islets being integral for this being achieved. Further understanding of the complex mechanisms that regulate metabolic homeostasis and how these become dysregulated during metabolic diseases, which are currently a major global burden, will likely lead to the development of new highly desirable more effective therapeutic strategies to combat metabolic diseases such as T2D. Figure 9 shows the hormones and their main/established effects discussed in this review with the key points raised.

Figure 9 The hormones discussed in this review and the key points raised. The hormones involved in the regulation of metabolic homeostasis produced by the pancreas and the GIT discussed in this review are shown with their main/established effects. The key points of this review are displayed here, to highlight the potential importance of further understanding these hormones’ actions in isolation and synergistically during healthy and disease states could generate more efficacious and highly desirable treatments for metabolic disorders, such as T2D and obesity. This figure and the information in its legend are adapted from these studies.26,32,42,48,107,120,143,148,164,165

Abbreviations

AA, amino acid; ADP/ATP, adenosine diphosphate/triphosphate; cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CV, Cardiovascular; CNS, Central nervous system; DIRKO, Double incretin receptor knockout; DPP, Dipeptidyl peptidase; Epac, Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP; GIP, Gastric inhibitory peptide; GIPR, Gastric inhibitory peptide receptor; GIT, Gastrointestinal tract; GLP-1, Glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1R, GLP-1 receptor; GLUT, Glucose transporter; GPCR, G-protein coupled receptor; GSIS, Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion; GCGR, Glucagon receptor; IGF, Insulin-like growth factor; IGFR, Insulin-like growth factor receptor; LAD, Left anterior descending; PDX-1, Pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1; PKA, Protein kinase A; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; T1D/T2D, type 1/2 diabetes.

Acknowledgments

The work in VK’s laboratory was supported by a grant from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) UK (BB/S019588/1). JR was a recipient of the Knowledge Economy Skills Scholarship (KESS) II UK PhD studentship. We thank the members of the VK laboratory.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Egan B, Zierath J. Zierath Juleen R. Exercise Metabolism and the Molecular Regulation of Skeletal Muscle Adaptation. Cell Metab. 2013;17(2):162–184. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.12.012

2. Metallo Christian M, Vander Heiden Matthew G. Understanding Metabolic Regulation and Its Influence on Cell Physiology. Molecular Cell. 2013;49(3):388–398. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.018

3. Affourtit C. Mitochondrial involvement in skeletal muscle insulin resistance: a case of imbalanced bioenergetics. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2016;1857(10):1678–1693.

4. Voet D, Voet J. Biochemistry. 4th ed. New York: Wiley & Sons; 2011.

5. Fu Z, Gilbert ER, Liu D. Regulation of insulin synthesis and secretion and pancreatic Beta-cell dysfunction in diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013;9(1):25–53. doi:10.2174/157339913804143225

6. Hædersdal S, Lund A, Knop FK, Vilsbøll T. The Role of Glucagon in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(2):217–239. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.12.003

7. Aronoff SL, Berkowitz K, Shreiner B, Want L. Glucose Metabolism and Regulation: beyond Insulin and Glucagon. Diabetes Spectr. 2004;17(3):183–190. doi:10.2337/diaspect.17.3.183

8. Dimitriadis G, Mitrou P, Lambadiari V, Maratou E, Raptis SA. Insulin effects in muscle and adipose tissue. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:S52–S59.

9. Röder PV, Wu B, Liu Y, Han W. Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48(3):e219–e219.

10. Brereton MF, Vergari E, Zhang Q, Alpha- CA. Delta- and PP-cells: are They the Architectural Cornerstones of Islet Structure and Co-ordination?. J Histochem Cytochem. 2015;63(8):575–591. doi:10.1369/0022155415583535

11. De Graaf C, Donnelly D, Wootten D, et al. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Its Class B G Protein–Coupled Receptors: a Long March to Therapeutic Successes. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(4):954–1013. doi:10.1124/pr.115.011395

12. Forbes JM, Cooper ME. Mechanisms of Diabetic Complications. Physiol Rev. 2013;93(1):137–188. doi:10.1152/physrev.00045.2011

13. Creutzfeldt W. The [pre-] history of the incretin concept. Regul Pept. 2005;128(2):87–91. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2004.08.004

14. Holst JJ. From the Incretin Concept and the Discovery of GLP-1 to Today’s Diabetes Therapy. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:260.

15. Graaf C, Donnelly D, Wootten D, et al. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 and Its Class B G Protein-Coupled Receptors: a Long March to Therapeutic Successes. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(4):954–1013.

16. Goldstein B, Wieland D. Type 2 Diabetes: Principles and Practice. Second Edition. ed. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2007.

17. Salehi M, Aulinger B, D’Alessio D. Effect of Glycemia on Plasma Incretins and the Incretin Effect During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Diabetes. 2012;61(11):2728–2733. doi:10.2337/db11-1825

18. Reed J, Bain S, Kanamarlapudi V. A Review of Current Trends with Type 2 Diabetes Epidemiology, Aetiology, Pathogenesis, Treatments and Future Perspectives. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021;14:3567–3602. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S319895

19. Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I, Beagley J, Linnenkamp U, Shaw JE. Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for 2035. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014;103(2):137–149. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002

20. Hinney A, Körner A, Fischer-Posovszky P. The promise of new anti-obesity therapies arising from knowledge of genetic obesity traits. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18(10):623–637. doi:10.1038/s41574-022-00716-0

21. Doulla M, McIntyre AD, Hegele RA, Gallego PH. A novel MC4R mutation associated with childhood-onset obesity: a case report. Paediatrics Child Health. 2014;19(10):515–518. doi:10.1093/pch/19.10.515

22. Telci Caklili O, Cesur M, Mikhailidis DP, Rizzo M. Novel Anti-obesity Therapies and their Different Effects and Safety Profiles: a Critical Overview. Int J Med. 2023;16:1767–1774. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S392684

23. Müller TD, Blüher M, Tschöp MH, DiMarchi RD. Anti-obesity drug discovery: advances and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(3):201–223. doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00337-8

24. Gulinac M, Miteva DG, Peshevska-Sekulovska M, et al. Long-term effectiveness, outcomes and complications of bariatric surgery. World j Clin Cases. 2023;11(19):4504–4512. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4504

25. Ozougwu JC, Obimba KC, Belonwu CD, Unakalamba CB. The pathogenesis and pathophysiology of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Physiol Pathophysiol. 2013;4:46–57. doi:10.5897/JPAP2013.0001

26. Thompson A, Kanamarlapudi V. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Glucagon Like Peptide-1 Receptor Signalling. Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2013;3.

27. Maahs DM, West NA, Lawrence JM, Mayer-Davis EJ. Chapter 1: epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clinics North Am. 2010;39(3):481–497. doi:10.1016/j.ecl.2010.05.011

28. Kahn SE, Cooper ME, Del Prato S. Pathophysiology and treatment of type 2 diabetes: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Lancet. 2014;383(9922):1068–1083. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62154-6

29. Leahy JL. Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Archiv Med Res. 2005;36(3):197–209. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.01.003

30. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Zimmet PZ. The worldwide epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus[mdash]present and future perspectives. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(4):228–236. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2011.183

31. Raz I. Guideline Approach to Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 2):S139–S144. doi:10.2337/dcS13-2035

32. Reed J, Bain S, Kanamarlapudi V. Recent advances in understanding the role of glucagon-like peptide 1 [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research. 2020;9(239):1–14. doi:10.12688/f1000research.20602.1

33. Moede T, Leibiger IB, Berggren P-O. Alpha cell regulation of beta cell function. Diabetologia. 2020;63(10):2064–2075. doi:10.1007/s00125-020-05196-3

34. Quesada I, Tudurí E, Ripoll C, Nadal Á. Physiology of the pancreatic α-cell and glucagon secretion: role in glucose homeostasis and diabetes. J Endocrinol. 2008;199(1):5–19. doi:10.1677/JOE-08-0290

35. Komatsu M, Takei M, Ishii H, Sato Y. Glucose-stimulated insulin secretion: a newer perspective. J Diabetes Invest. 2013;4(6):511–516. doi:10.1111/jdi.12094

36. Qaid MM, Abdelrahman MM. Role of insulin and other related hormones in energy metabolism—A review. Cogent Food Agric. 2016;2(1):1267691. doi:10.1080/23311932.2016.1267691

37. Jain R, Lammert E. Cell–cell interactions in the endocrine pancreas. Diabetes Obesity Metab. 2009;11(s4):159–167. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01102.x

38. Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Gagniuc PA, Gubceac E, et al. A 3D map of the islet routes throughout the healthy human pancreas. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):14634. doi:10.1038/srep14634

39. Pugliese A. The Insulin Gene In Type 1 Diabetes. IUBMB Life. 2005;57(7):463–468. doi:10.1080/15216540500163301

40. Wilcox G. Insulin and Insulin Resistance. Clin Biochemist Rev. 2005;26(2):19–39.

41. Affourtit C, Brand MD. On the role of uncoupling protein-2 in pancreatic beta cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2008;1777(7–8):973–979. doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.03.022

42. Affourtit C, Jastroch M, Brand MD. Uncoupling protein-2 attenuates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in INS-1E insulinoma cells by lowering mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;50(5):609–616. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.12.020

43. Patzelt C, Labrecque AD, Duguid JR, et al. Detection and kinetic behavior of preproinsulin in pancreatic islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75(3):1260–1264. doi:10.1073/pnas.75.3.1260

44. Boland BB, Rhodes CJ, Grimsby JS. The dynamic plasticity of insulin production in β-cells. Mol Metabol. 2017;6(9):958–973. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2017.04.010

45. Udell JA, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate or Severe Renal Impairment: observations From the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(4):696. doi:10.2337/dc14-1850

46. Rhodes CJ. Type 2 Diabetes-A Matter of ß-Cell Life and Death?. Science. 2005;307(5708):380. doi:10.1126/science.1104345

47. Matschinsky F, Liang Y, Kesavan P, et al. Glucokinase as pancreatic beta cell glucose sensor and diabetes gene. J Clin Investig. 1993;92(5):2092–2098. doi:10.1172/JCI116809

48. Affourtit C. Brand Martin D. Uncoupling protein-2 contributes significantly to high mitochondrial proton leak in INS-1E insulinoma cells and attenuates glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Biochem. J. 2008;409(1):199–204. doi:10.1042/BJ20070954

49. Rolfe DF, Brand MD. Contribution of mitochondrial proton leak to skeletal muscle respiration and to standard metabolic rate. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1996;271(4):C1380–C1389. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1996.271.4.C1380

50. Robson-Doucette CA, Sultan S, Allister EM, et al. β-Cell Uncoupling Protein 2 Regulates Reactive Oxygen Species Production, Which Influences Both Insulin and Glucagon Secretion. Diabetes. 2011;60(11):2710–2719. doi:10.2337/db11-0132

51. Ahmed Alfar E, Kirova D, Konantz J, Birke S, Mansfeld J, Ninov N. Distinct Levels of Reactive Oxygen Species Coordinate Metabolic Activity with Beta-cell Mass Plasticity. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3994. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03873-9

52. Lei XG, Vatamaniuk MZ. Two tales of antioxidant enzymes on β cells and diabetes. Antioxidants Redox Signaling. 2011;14(3):489–503. doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3416

53. Henquin J-C. The dual control of insulin secretion by glucose involves triggering and amplifying pathways in beta-cells. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;93:S27–S31.

54. Newsholme P, Krause M. Nutritional Regulation of Insulin Secretion: implications for Diabetes. Clin Biochem Rev. 2012;33(2):35–47.

55. Wang Z, Thurmond DC. Mechanisms of biphasic insulin-granule exocytosis – roles of the cytoskeleton, small GTPases and SNARE proteins. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(7):893. doi:10.1242/jcs.034355

56. Rutter GA. Nutrient–secretion coupling in the pancreatic islet β-cell: recent advances. Mol Aspect Med. 2001;22(6):247–284. doi:10.1016/S0098-2997(01)00013-9

57. Detimary P, Dejonghe S, Ling Z, Pipeleers D, Schuit F, Henquin JC. The changes in adenine nucleotides measured in glucose-stimulated rodent islets occur in beta cells but not in alpha cells and are also observed in human islets. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:1–4. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.51.33905

58. Ronner P, Naumann CM, Friel E. Effects of glucose and amino acids on free ADP in ßHC9 insulin-secreting cells. Diabetes. 2001;50:1–10. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.2.291

59. Zhang T, Li C. Mechanisms of amino acid-stimulated insulin secretion in congenital hyperinsulinism. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2013;45(1):36–43. doi:10.1093/abbs/gms107

60. Thorens B. Neural regulation of pancreatic islet cell mass and function. Diabetes Obesity Metab. 2014;16(S1):87–95. doi:10.1111/dom.12346

61. Gromada J, Hughes TE. Ringing the dinner bell for insulin: muscarinic M3 receptor activity in the control of pancreatic β cell function. Cell Metab. 2006;3(6):390–392. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.004

62. Lasschuijt MP, Mars M, de Graaf C, Smeets PAM. Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses to Food Cues: a Systematic Review. Adv. Nutr. 2020;11(5):1364–1383. doi:10.1093/advances/nmaa059

63. Teff KL. How neural mediation of anticipatory and compensatory insulin release helps us tolerate food. Physiol Behav. 2011;103(1):44–50. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.012

64. Marliss EB, Vranic M. Intense Exercise Has Unique Effects on Both Insulin Release and Its Roles in Glucoregulation. Diabetes. 2002;51(suppl 1):S271–S283. doi:10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.S271

65. Kong CC, Cheng JD, Wang W. Neurotransmitters regulate β cells insulin secretion: a neglected factor. World j Clin Cases. 2023;11(28):6670–6679. doi:10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6670

66. Leiss V, Flockerzie K, Novakovic A, et al. Insulin secretion stimulated by L-arginine and its metabolite L-ornithine depends on Gαi2. Am J Physio. 2014;307(9):E800–E812. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00337.2014

67. Yang J, Chi Y, Burkhardt BR, Guan Y, Wolf BA. Leucine metabolism in regulation of insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(5):270–279. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00282.x

68. Yanagisawa Y. How dietary amino acids and high protein diets influence insulin secretion. Physiological Reports. 2023;11(2):e15577. doi:10.14814/phy2.15577

69. Shah Z, Kampfrath T, Deiuliis JA, et al. Long-term dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibition reduces atherosclerosis and inflammation via effects on monocyte recruitment and chemotaxis. Circulation. 2011;124(21):2338–2349. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.041418

70. Henquin J-C. Paracrine and autocrine control of insulin secretion in human islets: evidence and pending questions. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2020;320(1):E78–E86. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00485.2020

71. Rhodes CJ, White MF, Leahy JL, Kahn SE. Direct Autocrine Action of Insulin on β-Cells: does It Make Physiological Sense?. Diabetes. 2013;62(7):2157–2163. doi:10.2337/db13-0246

72. Wicksteed B, Alarcon C, Briaud I, Lingohr MK, Rhodes CJ. Glucose-induced Translational Control of Proinsulin Biosynthesis Is Proportional to Preproinsulin mRNA Levels in Islet β-Cells but Not Regulated via a Positive Feedback of Secreted Insulin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(43):42080–42090. doi:10.1074/jbc.M303509200

73. Hunter SJ, Garvey WT. Insulin action and insulin resistance: diseases involving defects in insulin receptors, signal transduction, and the glucose transport effector system 1. Am j Med. 1998;105(4):331–345. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00300-3

74. Huang S, Czech MP. The GLUT4 Glucose Transporter. Cell Metab. 2007;5(4):237–252. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2007.03.006

75. Mandarino LJ, Printz RL, Cusi KA, et al. Regulation of hexokinase II and glycogen synthase mRNA, protein, and activity in human muscle. Am J Physio. 1995;269(4):E701–E708. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1995.269.4.E701

76. Rossetti L, Hu M. Skeletal muscle glycogenolysis is more sensitive to insulin than is glucose transport/phosphorylation. Relation to the insulin-mediated inhibition of hepatic glucose production. J Clin Investig. 1993;92(6):2963–2974. doi:10.1172/JCI116919

77. Kawamori D, Kurpad AJ, Hu J, et al. Insulin Signaling in α-cells Modulates Glucagon Secretion in vivo. Cell Metab. 2009;9(4):350–361. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2009.02.007

78. Xu GG, Rothenberg PL. Insulin Receptor Signaling in the β-Cell Influences Insulin Gene Expression and Insulin Content: evidence for Autocrine β-Cell Regulation. Diabetes. 1998;47(8):1243–1252. doi:10.2337/diab.47.8.1243

79. Skovsø S, Panzhinskiy E, Kolic J, et al. Beta-cell specific Insr deletion promotes insulin hypersecretion and improves glucose tolerance prior to global insulin resistance. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):735. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28039-8

80. Thomas DM, Udagawa N, Hards DK, et al. Insulin receptor expression in primary and cultured osteoclast-like cells. Bone. 1998;23(3):181–186. doi:10.1016/S8756-3282(98)00095-7

81. Stockhorst U, de Fries D, Steingrueber H-J, Scherbaum WA. Insulin and the CNS: effects on food intake, memory, and endocrine parameters and the role of intranasal insulin administration in humans. Physiol Behav. 2004;83(1):47–54. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(04)00348-8

82. Agrawal R, Reno CM, Sharma S, Christensen C, Huang Y, Fisher SJ. Insulin action in the brain regulates both central and peripheral functions. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021;321(1):E156–E163. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00642.2020

83. Gerozissis K. Brain insulin and feeding: a bi-directional communication. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2004;490(1–3):59–70. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.02.044

84. Csajbók ÉA, Tamás G. Cerebral cortex: a target and source of insulin?. Diabetologia. 2016;59(8):1609–1615. doi:10.1007/s00125-016-3996-2

85. Klok MD, Jakobsdottir S, Drent ML. The role of leptin and ghrelin in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans: a review. Obesity Rev. 2007;8(1):21–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2006.00270.x

86. Paz-Filho G, Mastronardi C, Delibasi T, Wong M-L, Licinio J. Congenital leptin deficiency: diagnosis and effects of leptin replacement therapy. Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia. 2010;54(8):690–697. doi:10.1590/S0004-27302010000800005

87. Lee B, Shao J. Adiponectin and Energy Homeostasis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2014;15(2):149–156. doi:10.1007/s11154-013-9283-3

88. Lihn AS, Pedersen SB, Richelsen B. Adiponectin: action, regulation and association to insulin sensitivity. Obesity Rev. 2005;6(1):13–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2005.00159.x

89. Qiao L, Kinney B, Schaack J, Shao J. Adiponectin Inhibits Lipolysis in Mouse Adipocytes. Diabetes. 2011;60(5):1519–1527. doi:10.2337/db10-1017

90. Kim J-Y, van de Wall E, Laplante M, et al. Obesity-associated improvements in metabolic profile through expansion of adipose tissue. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2621–2637. doi:10.1172/JCI31021

91. Haugen F, Jørgensen A, Drevon CA, Trayhurn P. Inhibition by insulin of resistin gene expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. FEBS Lett. 2001;507(1):105–108. doi:10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02968-4

92. Jamaluddin MS, Weakley SM, Yao Q, Chen C. Resistin: functional roles and therapeutic considerations for cardiovascular disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012;165(3):622–632. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01369.x

93. Hasegawa G, Ohta M, Ichida Y, et al. Increased serum resistin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes are not linked with markers of insulin resistance and adiposity. Acta Diabetologica. 2005;42(2):104–109. doi:10.1007/s00592-005-0187-x

94. Iqbal N, Seshadri P, Stern L, et al. Serum resistin is not associated with obesity or insulin resistance in humans. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2005;9:161–165.

95. Laudes M, Oberhauser F, Schulte DM, et al. Visfatin/PBEF/Nampt and Resistin Expressions in Circulating Blood Monocytes are Differentially Related to Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in Humans. Horm Metab Res. 2010;42(04):268–273. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1243638

96. Siddiqui K, Scaria Joy S, George TP. Circulating resistin levels in relation with insulin resistance, inflammatory and endothelial dysfunction markers in patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose. EndocrineMetab Sci. 2020;1(3):100059. doi:10.1016/j.endmts.2020.100059

97. Milan G, Granzotto M, Scarda A, et al. Resistin and Adiponectin Expression in Visceral Fat of Obese Rats: effect of Weight Loss. Obesity Res. 2002;10(11):1095–1103.

98. Wu G, Meininger CJ. Nitric oxide and vascular insulin resistance. BioFactors. 2009;35(1):21–27. doi:10.1002/biof.3

99. Sechi L, Bartoli E. Molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance in arterial hypertension. Blood Press Suppl. 1996;1:47–54.

100. Pradhan G, Samson SL, Sun Y. Ghrelin: much more than a hunger hormone. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2013;16(6):619–624. doi:10.1097/MCO.0b013e328365b9be

101. Yin X, Yin L, Geyang X, Wenjiao A, Zhang W. Ghrelin fluctuation, what determines its production?. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2009;41(3):188–197. doi:10.1093/abbs/gmp001

102. Gagnon J, Anini Y. Insulin and Norepinephrine Regulate Ghrelin Secretion from a Rat Primary Stomach Cell Culture. Endocrinology. 2012;153(8):3646–3656. doi:10.1210/en.2012-1040

103. Tadahiro Kitamura CRK, Accili D. Insulin Receptor Knockout Mice. Annual Review of Physiol. 2003;65(1):313–332. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.65.092101.142540

104. Bunner AE, Chandrasekera PC, Barnard ND. Knockout mouse models of insulin signaling: relevance past and future. World J Diabetes. 2014;5(2):146–159. doi:10.4239/wjd.v5.i2.146

105. Zahradka P, Werner J, Yau L. Expression and regulation of the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor by growing and quiescent H4IIE hepatoma. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Biomembranes. 1998;1375(1–2):131–139. doi:10.1016/S0005-2736(98)00144-8

106. Kim W, Egan JM. The Role of Incretins in Glucose Homeostasis and Diabetes Treatment. Pharmacol Rev. 2008;60(4):470–512. doi:10.1124/pr.108.000604

107. Holst JJ. The Physiology of Glucagon-like Peptide 1. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(4):1409–1439. doi:10.1152/physrev.00034.2006

108. Donath MY, Burcelin R. GLP-1 Effects on Islets: hormonal, Neuronal, or Paracrine?. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 2):S145–S148. doi:10.2337/dcS13-2015

109. Hinnen D. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists for Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2017;30(3):202. doi:10.2337/ds16-0026

110. Jacobson DA, Wicksteed BL, Philipson LH. The α-Cell Conundrum: ATP-Sensitive K+Channels and Glucose Sensing. Diabetes. 2009;58(2):304–306. doi:10.2337/db08-1618

111. Gylfe E. Glucose Control of Glucagon Secretion: there Is More to It Than K_ATP Channels. Diabetes. 2013;62(5):1391–1393. doi:10.2337/db13-0193

112. Reed J, Kanamarlapudi V. GLP-1. In: Choi S, editor. Encyclopedia of Signaling Molecules. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018:2098–2106.

113. Taborsky GJ. The Physiology of Glucagon. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010;4(6):1338–1344. doi:10.1177/193229681000400607

114. Christensen M, Bagger JI, Vilsboll T, Knop FK. The Alpha-Cell as Target for Type 2 Diabetes Therapy. Rev Diabetic Stud. 2011;8(3):369–381. doi:10.1900/RDS.2011.8.369

115. Jiang G, Zhang BB. Glucagon and regulation of glucose metabolism. Am J Physio. 2003;284(4):E671–E678. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00492.2002

116. Leibiger B, Moede T, Muhandiramlage TP, et al. Glucagon regulates its own synthesis by autocrine signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(51):20925–20930. doi:10.1073/pnas.1212870110

117. Habegger KM, Heppner KM, Geary N, Bartness TJ, DiMarchi R, Tschöp MH. The metabolic actions of glucagon revisited. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6(12):689–697. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.187

118. Huypens P, Ling Z, Pipeleers D, Schuit F. Glucagon receptors on human islet cells contribute to glucose competence of insulin release. Diabetologia. 2000;43(8):1012–1019. doi:10.1007/s001250051484

119. Doyle ME, Egan JM. Mechanisms of Action of GLP-1 in the Pancreas. Pharmacol Ther. 2007;113(3):546–593.

120. Seino Y, Fukushima M, Yabe D. GIP and GLP‐1, the two incretin hormones: similarities and differences. J Diabetes Invest. 2010;1(1–2):8–23. doi:10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00022.x

121. Ahrén B, Yamada Y, Seino Y. The mediation by GLP-1 receptors of glucagon-induced insulin secretion revisited in GLP-1 receptor knockout mice. Peptides. 2021;135:170434. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170434

122. Condon JR. Glucagon in the Treatment of Paget’s Disease of Bone. Br Med J. 1971;4(5789):5789):719–721. doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5789.719

123. Guo H, Sui C, Ge S, et al. Positive association of glucagon with bone turnover markers in type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Diabetes/Metab Res Rev. 2022;38(6):e3550. doi:10.1002/dmrr.3550

124. Al-Massadi O, Fernø J, Diéguez C, Nogueiras R, Quiñones M. Glucagon Control on Food Intake and Energy Balance. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3905. doi:10.3390/ijms20163905

125. Sipos B, Sperveslage J, Anlauf M, et al. Glucagon Cell Hyperplasia and Neoplasia With and Without Glucagon Receptor Mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(5):E783–E788. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-4405

126. Yu R. Pancreatic α-Cell Hyperplasia: facts and Myths. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(3):748–756. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-2952

127. Gelling RW, Du XQ, Dichmann DS, et al. Lower blood glucose, hyperglucagonemia, and pancreatic α cell hyperplasia in glucagon receptor knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(3):1438–1443. doi:10.1073/pnas.0237106100

128. Hauge-Evans A, Bowe K, Franklin Z, Hassan Z, Jones P. Inhibitory effect of somatostatin on insulin secretion is not mediated via the CNS. J Endocrinol. 2015;225(1):19–26. doi:10.1530/JOE-14-0709

129. Grigoryan M, Kedees MH, Charron MJ, Guz Y, Teitelman G. Regulation of Mouse Intestinal L Cell Progenitors Proliferation by the Glucagon Family of Peptides. Endocrinology. 2012;153(7):3076–3088. doi:10.1210/en.2012-1120

130. Sinclair EM, Yusta B, Streutker C, et al. Glucagon Receptor Signaling Is Essential for Control of Murine Hepatocyte Survival. Gastroenterology. 2015;135(6):2096–2106. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.075

131. Krejs G. Physiological role of somatostatin in the digestive tract: gastric acid secretion, intestinal absorption, and motility. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1986;119(sup119):47–53. doi:10.3109/00365528609087431

132. Lengyel A-MJ. Novel mechanisms of growth hormone regulation: growth hormone-releasing peptides and ghrelin. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006;39(8):1003–1011. doi:10.1590/S0100-879X2006000800002

133. Barnett P. Somatostatin and somatostatin receptor physiology. Endocrine. 2003;20(3):255–264. doi:10.1385/ENDO:20:3:255

134. Reubi JC, Schaer JC, Markwalder R, Waser B, Horisberger U, Laissue J. Distribution of somatostatin receptors in normal and neoplastic human tissues: recent advances and potential relevance. Yale J Biology Med. 1997;70(5–6):471–479.

135. Rutter GA. Regulating Glucagon Secretion: somatostatin in the Spotlight. Diabetes. 2009;58(2):299–301. doi:10.2337/db08-1534

136. Barden N, Lavoie M, Dupont A, Cote J, Cote J. Stimulation of glucagon release by addition of anti-somatostatin serum to islet of Langerhans in vitro. Endocrinology. 1977;101:635–638. doi:10.1210/endo-101-2-635

137. Gerich J, Lorenzi M, Schneider V, et al. Inhibition of pancreatic glucagon responses to arginine by somatostatin in normal man and in insulin-dependent diabetics. Diabetes. 1974;23(11):876–880. doi:10.2337/diab.23.11.876

138. Kr BFC, Moldovan S, Nguyen TH, Watt PC, Walsh J, Gingerich R. Immunoneutralization of somatostatin, insulin, and glucagon causes alterations in islet cell secretion in the isolated perfused human pancreas. Pancreas. 2001;23(3):302–308. doi:10.1097/00006676-200110000-00012

139. Kawai K, Ol IE, Perrelet A, U RH. Circulating somatostatin acts on the islets of Langerhans by way of a somatostatin-poor compartment. Science. 1982;218(4571):477–478. doi:10.1126/science.6126931

140. Cejvan K, Coy DH, Efendic S. Intra-Islet Somatostatin Regulates Glucagon Release via Type 2 Somatostatin Receptors in Rats. Diabetes. 2003;52(5):1176–1181. doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1176

141. Luque R, Kineman R. Gender-Dependent Role of Endogenous Somatostatin in Regulating Growth Hormone-Axis Function in Mice. Endocrinology. 2007;148(12):5998–6006. doi:10.1210/en.2007-0946

142. Hauge-Evans AC, King AJ, Carmignac D, et al. Somatostatin Secreted by Islet δ-Cells Fulfills Multiple Roles as a Paracrine Regulator of Islet Function. Diabetes. 2009;58(2):403–411. doi:10.2337/db08-0792

143. Hauge-Evans A, Bowe J, Franklin Z, Hassan Z, Jones P. Inhibitory effect of somatostatin on insulin secretion is not mediated via the CNS. J Endocrinol. 2015;225(1):19–26.

144. Pais R, Gribble FM, Reimann F. Stimulation of incretin secreting cells. Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2016;7(1):24–42. doi:10.1177/2042018815618177

145. Svendsen B, Holst JJ. Paracrine regulation of somatostatin secretion by insulin and glucagon in mouse pancreatic islets. Jan. 2021;64(1):142–151.

146. Lieverse R, Jansen J, Masclee A, Lamers C. Effects of somatostatin on human satiety. Neuroendocrinology. 1995;61(2):112–116. doi:10.1159/000126831

147. Nishi S, Seino Y, Ishida H, et al. Vagal regulation of insulin, glucagon, and somatostatin secretion in vitro in the rat. J Clin Investig. 1987;79(4):1191–1196. doi:10.1172/JCI112936

148. Floyd JJ, Fajans S, Pek S, Chance R. A newly recognized pancreatic polypeptide; plasma levels in health and disease. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1976;33:519–570. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-571133-3.50019-2

149. Aragón F, Karaca M, Novials A, Maldonado R, Maechler P, Rubí B. Pancreatic polypeptide regulates glucagon release through PPYR1 receptors expressed in mouse and human alpha-cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2015;1850(2):343–351. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.11.005

150. Fetissov SO, Kopp J, Hökfelt T. Distribution of NPY receptors in the hypothalamus. Neuropeptides. 2004;38(4):175–188. doi:10.1016/j.npep.2004.05.009

151. Dembiński A, Warzecha Z, Ceranowicz P, et al. Influence of central and peripheral administration of pancreatic polypeptide on gastric mucosa growth. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2004;55(1 Pt 2):223–237.

152. Adrian TE, Greenberg GR, Barnes AJ, Christofides ND, Alberti KG, B SR. Effects of pancreatic polypeptide on motilin and circulation metabolites in man. Eur J Clin Invest. 1980;10:235–240. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.1980.tb00026.x

153. Khan D, Vasu S, Moffett RC, Irwin N, Flatt PR. Influence of neuropeptide Y and pancreatic polypeptide on islet function and beta-cell survival. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2017;1861(4):749–758. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2017.01.005

154. Kim W, Fiori JL, Shin Y-K, et al. Pancreatic polypeptide inhibits somatostatin secretion. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(17):3233–3239. doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2014.07.005

155. Brunicardi FC, Chaiken RL, Ryan AS, et al. Pancreatic polypeptide administration improves abnormal glucose metabolism in patients with chronic pancreatitis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(10):3566–3572.

156. Seymour N, Brunicardi F, Chaiken R, et al. Reversal of abnormal glucose production after pancreatic resection by pancreatic polypeptide administration in man. Surgery. 1988;104(2):119–129.

157. Goldstein J, Kirwin J, Seymour N, Trachtenberg J, Rademaker E, Andersen D. Reversal of in vitro hepatic insulin resistance in chronic pancreatitis by pancreatic polypeptide in the rat. Surgery. 1989;106:1132–1133.

158. Jesudason DR, Monteiro MP, McGowan BMC, et al. Low-dose pancreatic polypeptide inhibits food intake in man. Br. J. Nutr. 2007;97(3):426–429. doi:10.1017/S0007114507336799

159. Batterham RL, Le Roux CW, Cohen MA, et al. Pancreatic Polypeptide Reduces Appetite and Food Intake in Humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(8):3989–3992. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030630

160. Berntson GG, Zipf WB, Tm O, Hoffman JA, Chance RE. Pancreatic polypeptide infusions reduce food intake in Prader-Willi syndrome. Peptides. 1993;14(3):497–503. doi:10.1016/0196-9781(93)90138-7

161. Asakawa A, Inui A, Yuzuriha H, et al. Characterization of the effects of pancreatic polypeptide in the regulation of energy balance. Gastroenterology. 2003;124(5):1325–1336. doi:10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00216-6

162. Adamska E, Ostrowska L, Górska M, Krętowski A. The role of gastrointestinal hormones in the pathogenesis of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9(2):69–76. doi:10.5114/pg.2014.42498

163. Adrian TE, Besterman HS, Mallinson CN, Greenberg GR, Bloom SR. Inhibition of secretin stimulated pancreatic secretion by pancreatic polypeptide. Gut. 1979;20(1):37–40. doi:10.1136/gut.20.1.37

164. Akamizu T, Takaya K, Irako T, et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and endocrine and appetite effects of ghrelin administration in young healthy subjects. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004;150(4):447–455. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1500447

165. Yin X, Li Y, Xu G, An W, Zhang W. Ghrelin fluctuation, what determines its production?. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2009;41(3):188–197.

166. Müller TD, Nogueiras R, Andermann ML, et al. Ghrelin. Mol Metabol. 2015;4(6):437–460. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2015.03.005

167. Sato T, Nakamura Y, Shiimura Y, Ohgusu H, Kangawa K, Kojima M. Structure, regulation and function of ghrelin. J Biochem. 2012;151(2):119–128. doi:10.1093/jb/mvr134

168. Date Y, Nakazato M, Murakami N, Kojima M, Kangawa K, Matsukura S. Ghrelin Acts in the Central Nervous System to Stimulate Gastric Acid Secretion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001;280(3):904–907. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2000.4212

169. DiGruccio MR, Mawla AM, Donaldson CJ, et al. Comprehensive alpha, beta and delta cell transcriptomes reveal that ghrelin selectively activates delta cells and promotes somatostatin release from pancreatic islets. Mol Metabol. 2016;5(7):449–458. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2016.04.007

170. Churm R, Davies J, Stephens J, Prior S. Ghrelin function in human obesity and type 2 diabetes: a concise review: ghrelin in human obesity and diabetes. Obesity Reviews : an Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2016;18(2):140–148. doi:10.1111/obr.12474

171. Ahima RS. Ghrelin—a new player in glucose homeostasis?. Cell Metab. 2006;3(5):301–302. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.04.006

172. Lindqvist A, Shcherbina L, Prasad RB, et al. Ghrelin suppresses insulin secretion in human islets and type 2 diabetes patients have diminished islet ghrelin cell number and lower plasma ghrelin levels. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2020;511:110835. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2020.110835

173. Lv Y, Liang T, Wang G, Li Z. Ghrelin, a gastrointestinal hormone, regulates energy balance and lipid metabolism. Biosci Rep. 2018;38(5):BSR20181061. doi:10.1042/BSR20181061

174. Wells T. Ghrelin – defender of fat. Prog Lipid Res. 2009;48(5):257–274. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2009.04.002

175. Rehfeld JF. The Origin and Understanding of the Incretin Concept. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:387. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00387

176. Moore B. On the treatment of diabetes mellitus by acid extract of duodenal mucous membrane. Biochem J. 1906;1:28–38. doi:10.1042/bj0010028

177. Zunz E, LaBarre J. Hyperinsulinémie consécutive a l’injection de solution de secrétine non hypotensive. C R Soc Biol. 1928;98:1435–1438.

178. La Barre J. Sur les possibilite’sd’un traitement du diabète par l’incrétine. Bull Acad R Med Belg. 1932;12:14.

179. Elrick H, Stimmler L, Hlad CJ, Arai Y. PLASMA INSULIN RESPONSE TO ORAL AND INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE ADMINISTRATION. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1964;24(10):1076–1082. doi:10.1210/jcem-24-10-1076

180. McIntyre N, Holdsworth CD, Turner DS. New interpretation of oral glucose tolerance. Lancet. 1964;2(7349):20–21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(64)90011-X

181. Perley M, Kipnis D. Plasma insulin responses to oral and intravenous glucose: studies in normal and diabetic subjects. J Clin Invest. 1967;46(1954–1962):1954–1962. doi:10.1172/JCI105685

182. Brown JCDJ, Ross SA, Dupré J. Identification and actions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1975;31:487–532. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-571131-9.50017-7

183. Elahi D, Andersen D, Brown J, et al. Pancreatic alpha- and beta-cell responses to GIP infusion in normal man. Am J Physiol. 1979;237:185–191.

184. Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W. Influence of gastric inhibitory polypeptide antiserum on glucose-induced insulin secretion in rats. Endocrinology. 1982;111(5):1601–1606. doi:10.1210/endo-111-5-1601

185. Wt SD, Roth SE, Brenner MJ. Cell-free synthesis and processing of multiple precursors to glucagon. Nature. 1981;289:511–514. doi:10.1038/289511a0

186. Wg MS, Habener JF. Insulinotropin: glucagon-like peptide 1 (737) co-encoded in the glucagon gene is a potent stimulator of insulin release in the perfused rat pancreas. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:616–619. doi:10.1172/JCI112855

187. Yamada Y, Tsukiyama K, Sato T, Shimizu T, Fujita H, Narita T. Novel extrapancreatic effects of incretin. J Diabetes Invest. 2016;7(S1):76–79. doi:10.1111/jdi.12495

188. Dd BPL. Structure-function of the glucagon receptor family of G protein-coupled receptors: the glucagon, GIP, GLP-1, and GLP-2 receptors. Recept Channels. 2002;8:179–188. doi:10.1080/10606820213687

189. Wang X, Liu H, Chen J, Li Y, Qu S. Multiple Factors Related to the Secretion of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1. Int J Endocrinol. 2015;2015:11. doi:10.1155/2015/651757

190. Ahlkvist L, Vikman J, Pacini G, Ahrén B. Synergism by individual macronutrients explains the marked early GLP-1 and islet hormone responses to mixed meal challenge in mice. Regul Pept. 2012;178(1):29–35. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2012.06.004

191. Meloni AR, DeYoung MB, Lowe C, Parkes DG. GLP-1 receptor activated insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells: mechanism and glucose dependence. Diabetes Obesity Metab. 2013;15(1):15–27. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01663.x

192. Padidela R, Patterson M, Sharief N, Ghatei M, Hussain K. Elevated basal and post-feed glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) concentrations in the neonatal period. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(1):53–58. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0807

193. Dailey MJ, Moran TH. Glucagon-like peptide 1 and appetite. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2013;24(2):85–91. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2012.11.008

194. Anini Y, Hansotia T, Brubaker PL. Muscarinic Receptors Control Postprandial Release of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1: in Vivo and in Vitro Studies in Rats. Endocrinology. 2002;143(6):2420–2426. doi:10.1210/endo.143.6.8840

195. Gribble FM, Williams L, Simpson AK, Reimann F. A Novel Glucose-Sensing Mechanism Contributing to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Secretion From the GLUTag Cell Line. Diabetes. 2003;52(5):1147. doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.5.1147

196. Athauda D, Foltynie T. The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP) receptor as a therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease: mechanisms of action. Drug Discovery Today. 2016;21(5):802–818. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.013

197. Andreas Nygaard M, Gitte H, Sarah Juel P, et al. Long-term characterization of the diet-induced obese and diet-resistant rat model: a polygenetic rat model mimicking the human obesity syndrome. J Endocrinol. 2010;206(3):287–296. doi:10.1677/JOE-10-0004

198. Reimann F, Habib AM, Tolhurst G, Parker HE, Rogers GJ, Gribble FM. Glucose sensing in L cells: a primary cell study. Cell Metab. 2008;8(6):532–539. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2008.11.002

199. Seufert J, Gallwitz B. The extra-pancreatic effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists: a focus on the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. Diabetes Obesity Metab. 2014;16(8):673–688. doi:10.1111/dom.12251

200. Robinson E, Tate M, Lockhart S, et al. Metabolically-inactive glucagon-like peptide-1(9–36)amide confers selective protective actions against post-myocardial infarction remodelling. Cardiovascular Diabetology. 2016;15(1):65. doi:10.1186/s12933-016-0386-5

201. Sharma R, McDonald TS, Eng H, et al. In Vitro Metabolism of the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)–Derived Metabolites GLP-1(9-36)amide and GLP-1(28-36)amide in Mouse and Human Hepatocytes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2013;41(12):2148. doi:10.1124/dmd.113.054254

202. Habener JF, Stanojevic V. Pancreas and Not Gut Mediates the GLP-1-Induced Glucoincretin Effect. Cell Metab. 2017;25(4):757–758. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.020

203. Müller TD, Finan B, Bloom SR, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). Mol Metabol. 2019;30:72–130. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2019.09.010

204. Portha B, Tourrel-Cuzin C, Movassat J. Activation of the GLP-1 Receptor Signalling Pathway: a Relevant Strategy to Repair a Deficient Beta-Cell Mass. Exp Diabetes Res. 2011;2011:11. doi:10.1155/2011/376509

205. Rowlands J, Heng J, Newsholme P, Carlessi R. Pleiotropic Effects of GLP-1 and Analogs on Cell Signaling, Metabolism, and Function. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9(672):58. doi:10.3389/fendo.2018.00058

206. Tamura K, Minami K, Kudo M, Iemoto K, Takahashi H, Seino S. Liraglutide improves pancreatic Beta cell mass and function in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0126003. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126003

207. Garber AJ. Incretin effects on β-cell function, replication, and mass: the human perspective. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:S258–S263.

208. Xu G, Kaneto H, Lopez-Avalos MD, Weir GC, Bonner-Weir S. GLP-1/exendin-4 facilitates β-cell neogenesis in rat and human pancreatic ducts. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;73(1):107–110. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2005.11.007

209. Buteau J, Foisy S, Joly E, Prentki M. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Induces Pancreatic β-Cell Proliferation Via Transactivation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. Diabetes. 2003;52(1):124–132. doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.1.124

210. Biden TJ, Boslem E, Chu KY, Sue N. Lipotoxic endoplasmic reticulum stress, β cell failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2014;25(8):389–398. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2014.02.003

211. Buteau J. GLP-1 receptor signaling: effects on pancreatic β-cell proliferation and survival. Diabetes Metabolism. 2008;34:S73–S77.

212. Cunha DA, Ladrière L, Ortis F, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists protect pancreatic beta-cells from lipotoxic endoplasmic reticulum stress through upregulation of BiP and JunB. Diabetes. 2009;58(12):2851–2862. doi:10.2337/db09-0685

213. Shin T, Naoki Y, Katsura T, et al. Protection of pancreatic β-cells by exendin-4 may involve the reduction of endoplasmic reticulum stress; in vivo and in vitro studies. J Endocrinol. 2007;193(1):65–74. doi:10.1677/JOE-06-0148

214. Yusta B, Baggio LL, Estall JL, et al. GLP-1 receptor activation improves β cell function and survival following induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Metab. 2006;4(5):391–406. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2006.10.001

215. Arden C. A role for Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 in the regulation of β-cell autophagy. Peptides. 2018;100:85–93. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2017.12.002

216. Zummo FP, Cullen KS, Honkanen-Scott M, Shaw JAM, Lovat PE, Arden C. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Protects Pancreatic β-Cells From Death by Increasing Autophagic Flux and Restoring Lysosomal Function. Diabetes. 2017;66(5):1272–1285. doi:10.2337/db16-1009

217. Lim GE, Brubaker PL. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Secretion by the L-Cell. Diabetes. 2006;55(Supplement 2):S70–S77. doi:10.2337/db06-S020

218. Carlessi R, Chen Y, Rowlands J, et al. GLP-1 receptor signalling promotes β-cell glucose metabolism via mTOR-dependent HIF-1α activation. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2661. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02838-2

219. Cornu M, Modi H, Kawamori D, Kulkarni RN, Joffraud M, Thorens B. Glucagon-like peptide-1 increases beta-cell glucose competence and proliferation by translational induction of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor expression. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(14):10538–10545. doi:10.1074/jbc.M109.091116

220. Rowlands J, Cruzat V, Carlessi R, Newsholme P. Insulin and IGF-1 receptor autocrine loops are not required for Exendin-4 induced changes to pancreatic β-cell bioenergetic parameters and metabolism in BRIN-BD11 cells. Peptides. 2018;100:140–149. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2017.11.015

221. Simon Hughes PN D. Alpha cell function in type 1 diabetes. Br J Diabetes. 2014;14(2):45–51. doi:10.15277/bjdvd.2014.014

222. Meier JJ, Gethmann A, Götze O, et al. Glucagon-like peptide 1 abolishes the postprandial rise in triglyceride concentrations and lowers levels of non-esterified fatty acids in humans. Diabetologia. 2006;49(3):452–458. doi:10.1007/s00125-005-0126-y

223. Sancho V, Daniele G, Lucchesi D, et al. Metabolic regulation of GLP-1 and PC1/3 in pancreatic α-cell line. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187836. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187836

224. Campbell SA, Johnson J, Light PE. Evidence for the existence and potential roles of intra-islet glucagon-like peptide-1. Islets. 2021;13(1–2):32–50. doi:10.1080/19382014.2021.1889941

225. Saikia M, Holter MM, Donahue LR, et al. GLP-1 receptor signaling increases PCSK1 and β cell features in human α cells. JCI Insight. 2021;6(3). doi:10.1172/jci.insight.141851

226. Ramracheya R, Chapman C, Chibalina M, et al. GLP-1 suppresses glucagon secretion in human pancreatic alpha-cells by inhibition of P/Q-type Ca(2+) channels. Physiological Reports. 2018;6(17):e13852. doi:10.14814/phy2.13852

227. Zhang Y, Parajuli KR, Fava GE, et al. GLP-1 Receptor in Pancreatic α-Cells Regulates Glucagon Secretion in a Glucose-Dependent Bidirectional Manner. Diabetes. 2019;68(1):34–44. doi:10.2337/db18-0317

228. Wettergren A, Petersen H, Orskov C, Christiansen J, Sheikh SP, Holst JJ. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 7-36 Amide and Peptide YY from the L-Cell of the Ileal Mucosa Are Potent Inhibitors of Vagally Induced Gastric Acid Secretion in Man. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1994;29(6):501–505. doi:10.3109/00365529409092462

229. Maljaars PW, Peters HP, Mela DJ, M AA. Ileal brake: a sensible food target for appetite control: a review. Physiol Behav. 2008;95:271–281. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.07.018

230. Flint A, Raben A, Astrup A, Holst JJ. Glucagon-like peptide 1 promotes satiety and suppresses energy intake in humans. J Clin Investig. 1998;101(3):515–520. doi:10.1172/JCI990

231. Tang-Christensen M, Larsen PJ, Göke R, et al. Central administration of GLP-1-(7-36) amide inhibits food and water intake in rats. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:848–856.

232. Turton MD, O’Shea D, Gunn I, et al. A role for glucagon-like peptide-1 in the central regulation of feeding. Nature. 1996;379(6560):69–72. doi:10.1038/379069a0

233. Burcelin R, Da Costa A, Drucker D, T B. Glucose competence of the hepatoportal vein sensor requires the presence of an activated glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor. Diabetes. 2001;50(8):1720–1728. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1720

234. Alruwaili H, Dehestani B, le Roux CW. Clinical Impact of Liraglutide as a Treatment of Obesity. Clin Pharmacol. 2021;13:53–60. doi:10.2147/CPAA.S276085

235. Wang JY, Wang QW, Yang XY, et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of obesity: role as a promising approach. Front Endocrinol. 2023;14:1085799. doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1085799

236. Li J, Zheng J, Wang S, Lau HK, Fathi A, Wang Q. Cardiovascular Benefits of Native GLP-1 and its Metabolites: an Indicator for GLP-1-Therapy Strategies. Front Physiol. 2017;8:15. doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00015

237. Okerson T, Chilton RJ. The Cardiovascular Effects of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. Cardiovasc. Ther. 2012;30(3):e146–e155. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5922.2010.00256.x

238. Reed J, Kanamarlapudi V, Bain S. Mechanism of cardiovascular disease benefit of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists. Cardiovascular Endocrinol Metab. 2018;7(1):18–23. doi:10.1097/XCE.0000000000000147

239. Hein GJ, Baker C, Hsieh J, Farr S, Adeli K. GLP-1 and GLP-2 as Yin and Yang of Intestinal Lipoprotein Production: evidence for Predominance of GLP-2–Stimulated Postprandial Lipemia in Normal and Insulin-Resistant States. Diabetes. 2013;62(2):373–381. doi:10.2337/db12-0202

240. Moretto TJ, Milton DR, Ridge TD, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of exenatide monotherapy over 24 weeks in antidiabetic drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Clin. Ther. 2008;30(8):1448–1460. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.08.006

241. Shah Z, Kampfrath T, Deiuliis JA, et al. Chronic DPP-4 Inhibition Reduces Atherosclerosis and Inflammation via Effects on Monocyte Recruitment and Chemotaxis. Circulation. 2011;124(21):2338–2349.

242. Wright EJ, Farrell KA, Malik N, et al. Encapsulated Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Producing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Have a Beneficial Effect on Failing Pig Hearts. Stem Cells Translational Med. 2012;1(10):759–769. doi:10.5966/sctm.2012-0064

243. Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1317–1326. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1307684

244. White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1327–1335. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1305889

245. Kristensen SL, Rørth R, Jhund PS, et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(10):776–785. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30249-9

246. Lincoff AM, Brown-Frandsen K, Colhoun HM, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Obesity without Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(24):2221–2232. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2307563

247. Nathanson D, Erdogdu O, Pernow J, Zhang Q, Nyström T. Endothelial dysfunction induced by triglycerides is not restored by exenatide in rat conduit arteries ex vivo. Regul Pept. 2009;157(1–3):8–13. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2009.07.003

248. Ban K, Noyan-Ashraf MH, Hoefer J, Bolz -S-S, Drucker DJ, Husain M. Cardioprotective and Vasodilatory Actions of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Are Mediated Through Both Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor–Dependent and –Independent Pathways. Circulation. 2008;117(18):2340–2350. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.739938

249. Ban K, Kim K-H, Cho C-K, et al. Glucagon-Like Peptide (GLP)-1(9-36)Amide-Mediated Cytoprotection Is Blocked by Exendin(9-39) Yet Does Not Require the Known GLP-1 Receptor. Endocrinology. 2010;151(4):1520–1531. doi:10.1210/en.2009-1197

250. Drucker DJ. Mechanisms of Action and Therapeutic Application of Glucagon-like Peptide-1. Cell Metab. 2018;27(4):740–756. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.001

251. Hogan AE, Tobin AM, Ahern T, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and the regulation of human invariant natural killer T cells: lessons from obesity, diabetes and psoriasis. Diabetologia. 2011;54(11):2745–2754. doi:10.1007/s00125-011-2232-3

252. Faurschou A, Gyldenløve M, Rohde U, et al. Lack of effect of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide on psoriasis in glucose-tolerant patients – a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29(3):555–559. doi:10.1111/jdv.12629

253. Ellingsgaard H, Hauselmann I, Schuler B, et al. Interleukin-6 enhances insulin secretion by increasing glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from L cells and alpha cells. Nature med. 2011;17(11):1481–1489. doi:10.1038/nm.2513

254. Lebherz C, Schlieper G, Möllmann J, et al. GLP-1 Levels Predict Mortality in Patients with Critical Illness as Well as End-Stage Renal Disease. Am J Med. 2017;130(7):833–841.e833. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.03.010

255. Koehler JA, Baggio LL, Lamont BJ, Ali S, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation modulates pancreatitis-associated gene expression but does not modify the susceptibility to experimental pancreatitis in mice. Diabetes. 2009;58(9):2148–2161. doi:10.2337/db09-0626

256. Suarez-Pinzon WL, Power RF, Yan Y, Wasserfall C, Atkinson M, Rabinovitch A. Combination therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 and gastrin restores normoglycemia in diabetic NOD mice. Diabetes. 2008;57(12):3281–3288. doi:10.2337/db08-0688

257. Yusta B, Baggio LL, Koehler J, et al. GLP-1R Agonists Modulate Enteric Immune Responses Through the Intestinal Intraepithelial Lymphocyte GLP-1R. Diabetes. 2015;64(7):2537. doi:10.2337/db14-1577

258. Bendotti G, Montefusco L, Lunati ME, et al. The anti-inflammatory and immunological properties of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists. Pharmacol Res. 2022;182:106320. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106320

259. Gutzwiller J-P, Tschopp S, Bock A, et al. Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Induces Natriuresis in Healthy Subjects and in Insulin-Resistant Obese Men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(6):3055–3061. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-031403

260. Crajoinas RO, Oricchio FT, Pessoa TD, et al. Mechanisms mediating the diuretic and natriuretic actions of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;301(2):F355–F363. doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00729.2010

261. Kodera R, Shikata K, Kataoka HU, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist ameliorates renal injury through its anti-inflammatory action without lowering blood glucose level in a rat model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2011;54(4):965–978. doi:10.1007/s00125-010-2028-x

262. Mann JFE, Ørsted DD, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(9):839–848. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1616011

263. Kawanami D, Takashi Y. GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Diabetic Kidney Disease: from Clinical Outcomes to Mechanisms. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11(967). doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.00967

264. Giugliano D, Maiorino MI. GLP-1 receptor agonists for prevention of cardiorenal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis including the REWIND and PIONEER 6 trials. Int J Med. 2019;21(11):2576–2580. doi:10.1111/dom.13847

265. Rossing P, Baeres FMM, Bakris G, et al. The rationale, design and baseline data of FLOW, a kidney outcomes trial with once-weekly semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2023;38(9):2041–2051. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfad009

266. Williams DM, Evans M. Semaglutide: charting New Horizons in GLP-1 Analogue Outcome Studies. Diabetes Therapy. 2020;11(10):2221–2235. doi:10.1007/s13300-020-00917-8

267. Perry T, Lahiri DK, Sambamurti K, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 decreases endogenous amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) levels and protects hippocampal neurons from death induced by Aβ and iron. J Neurosci Res. 2003;72(5):603–612. doi:10.1002/jnr.10611

268. Gault VA, Hölscher C. GLP-1 agonists facilitate hippocampal LTP and reverse the impairment of LTP induced by beta-amyloid. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008;587(1):112–117. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.025

269. Athauda D, Maclagan K, Skene SS, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10103):1664–1675. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31585-4

270. Foltynie T, Aviles-Olmos I. Exenatide as a potential treatment for patients with Parkinson’s disease: first steps into the clinic. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2014;10(1):S38–S46. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.12.005

271. Li Y, Perry T, Kindy MS, et al. GLP-1 receptor stimulation preserves primary cortical and dopaminergic neurons in cellular and rodent models of stroke and Parkinsonism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(4):1285–1290. doi:10.1073/pnas.0806720106

272. Li Y, Chigurupati S, Holloway H, et al. Exendin-4 Ameliorates Motor Neuron Degeneration in Cellular and Animal Models of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. PLoS One. 2012;7:78.

273. Brierley DI, Holt MK, Singh A. Central and peripheral GLP-1 systems independently suppress eating. Feb. 2021;3(2):258–273.

274. Nørgaard CH, Friedrich S, Hansen CT, et al. Treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and incidence of dementia: data from pooled double-blind randomized controlled trials and nationwide disease and prescription registers. Alzheimer’s Dementia. 2022;8(1):e12268.

275. Raab EL, Vuguin PM, Stoffers DA, Simmons RA. Neonatal exendin-4 treatment reduces oxidative stress and prevents hepatic insulin resistance in intrauterine growth-retarded rats. Am J Physiol. 2009;297(6):R1785–R1794. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00519.2009

276. Redondo A, Trigo M, Acitores A, Valverde I, Villanueva-Peñacarrillo M. Cell signalling of the GLP-1 action in rat liver. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2003;204:43–50. doi:10.1016/S0303-7207(03)00146-1

277. Svegliati-Baroni G, Saccomanno S, Rychlicki C, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation stimulates hepatic lipid oxidation and restores hepatic signalling alteration induced by a high-fat diet in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2011;31(9):1285–1297. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02462.x

278. Hiroaki Y, Wataru A. Spatial expression of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor and caveolin-1 in hepatocytes with macrovesicular steatosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. BMJ Open Gastroenterology. 2020;7(1):e000370. doi:10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000370

279. Gonzalez N, Acitores A, Sancho V, Valverde I, VillanuevaPenacarrillo M. Effect of GLP-1 on glucose transport and its cell signalling in human myocytes. Regul Pept. 2005;126:203–211. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2004.10.002

280. Luque M, Gonzalez N, Marquez L, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose metabolism in human myocytes. J Endocrinol. 2002;173(3):465–473. doi:10.1677/joe.0.1730465

281. Yang H, Egan J, Wang Y, et al. GLP-1 action in L6 myotubes is via a receptor different from the pancreatic GLP-1 receptor. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 1998;275(3):675–683. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.1998.275.3.C675

282. Wu L, Zhou M, Li T, et al. GLP-1 regulates exercise endurance and skeletal muscle remodeling via GLP-1R/AMPK pathway. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2022;1869(9):119300. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2022.119300

283. Egan JM, Montrose Rafizadeh C, Wang Y, Bernier M, R J. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (7–36) amide (GLP-1) enhances insulin stimulated glucose metabolism in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: one of several potential extrapancreatic sites of GLP-1 action. Endocrinology. 1994;135:2070–2075. doi:10.1210/endo.135.5.7956929

284. Oben J, Morgan L, Fletcher J, Marks V. Effect of the enteropancreatic hormones, gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon like polypeptide-1 (7–36) amide, on fatty acid synthesis in explants of rat adipose tissue. J Endocrinol. 1991;130:267–272. doi:10.1677/joe.0.1300267

285. Wang Y, Kole HK, Montrose-Rafizadeh C, Perfetti R, Bernier M, E JM. Regulation of glucose transporters and hexose uptake in 3T3-L1 adipocytes: glucagon-like peptide-1 and insulin interactions. J Mol Endocrinol. 1997;19:241–248. doi:10.1677/jme.0.0190241

286. Zhao L, Zhu C, Lu M, et al. The key role of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in body fat redistribution. J Endocrinol. 2019;240(2):271–286. doi:10.1530/JOE-18-0374

287. Ejarque M, Guerrero-Pérez F, De la morena N, et al. Role of adipose tissue GLP-1R expression in metabolic improvement after bariatric surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes. Apr. 2019;9(1):6274.

288. Yamada C, Yamada Y, Tsukiyama K, et al. The Murine Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Is Essential for Control of Bone Resorption. Endocrinology. 2008;149(2):574–579. doi:10.1210/en.2007-1292

289. Lamari Y, Boissard C, Moukhtar MS, Jullienne A, Rosselin G, Garel JM. Expression of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor in a murine C cell line Regulation of calcitonin gene by glucagon-like peptide 1. FEBS Lett. 1996;393(2–3):248–252. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(96)00895-2

290. Nuche-Berenguer B, Moreno P, Portal-Nuñez S, Dapía S, Esbrit P, Villanueva-Peñacarrillo ML. Exendin-4 exerts osteogenic actions in insulin-resistant and type 2 diabetic states. Regul Pept. 2010;159(1–3):61–66. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2009.06.010

291. Xie B, Chen S, Xu Y, et al. The Impact of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists on Bone Metabolism and Its Possible Mechanisms in Osteoporosis Treatment. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12.

292. Holman RR, Bethel MA, Mentz RJ, et al. Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(13):1228–1239. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1612917

293. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834–1844. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1607141

294. Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R, et al. Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2247–2257. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1509225

295. Richter G, Feddersen O, Wagner U, Barth P, Goke R, G B. GLP-1 stimulates secretion of macromolecules from airways and relaxes pulmonary artery. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 1993;265(4):374–381. doi:10.1152/ajplung.1993.265.4.L374

296. Wang W, Mei A, Qian H, et al. The Role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Pulmonary Dis. 2023;18:129–137.

297. Altintas Dogan AD, Hilberg O, Hess S, Jensen TT, Bladbjerg EM. Respiratory Effects of Treatment with a Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist in Patients Suffering from Obesity and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Med. 2022;17:405–414. doi:10.2147/COPD.S350133

298. Scrocchi LA, Brown TJ, MaClusky N, et al. Glucose intolerance but normal satiety in mice with a null mutation in the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor gene. Nature Med. 1996;2(11):1254–1258. doi:10.1038/nm1196-1254

299. Ahrén B, Yamada Y, Seino Y. The Insulin Response to Oral Glucose in GIP and GLP-1 Receptor Knockout Mice: review of the Literature and Stepwise Glucose Dose Response Studies in Female Mice. Front Endocrinol. 2021;12.

300. Ussher JR, Baggio LL, Campbell JE, et al. Inactivation of the cardiomyocyte glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) unmasks cardiomyocyte-independent GLP-1R-mediated cardioprotection. Mol Metabol. 2014;3(5):507–517. doi:10.1016/j.molmet.2014.04.009

301. Smith EP, An Z, Wagner C, et al. The role of β-cell GLP-1 signaling in glucose regulation and response to diabetes drugs. Cell Metab. 2014;19(6):1050–1057. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2014.04.005

302. Ayala JE, Bracy DP, James FD, Burmeister MA, Wasserman DH, Drucker DJ. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Knockout Mice Are Protected from High-Fat Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance. Endocrinology. 2010;151(10):4678–4687. doi:10.1210/en.2010-0289

303. McIntosh CHS, Widenmaier S, Kim SJ. Chapter 15 Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; GIP). Vitamin hormon. 2009;80:409–471.

304. Vilsbøll T, Krarup T, Deacon CF, Madsbad S, Holst JJ. Reduced Postprandial Concentrations of Intact Biologically Active Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Diabetes. 2001;50(3):609–613. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.3.609

305. Vollmer K, Holst JJ, Baller B, et al. Predictors of Incretin Concentrations in Subjects With Normal, Impaired, and Diabetic Glucose Tolerance. Diabetes. 2008;57(3):678–687. doi:10.2337/db07-1124

306. Psichas A, Glass LL, Sharp SJ, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Galanin inhibits GLP‐1 and GIP secretion via the GAL(1) receptor in enteroendocrine L and K cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016;173(5):888–898. doi:10.1111/bph.13407

307. Kieffer T, McIntosh C, Pederson R. Degradation of glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and truncated glucagon‐like peptide 1 in vitro and in vivo by dipeptidyl peptidase IV. Endocrinology. 1995;136:3585–3596. doi:10.1210/endo.136.8.7628397

308. Preitner F, Ibberson M, Franklin I, et al. Gluco-incretins control insulin secretion at multiple levels as revealed in mice lacking GLP-1 and GIP receptors. J Clin Investig. 2004;113(4):635–645. doi:10.1172/JCI200420518

309. Taminato T, Seino Y, Goto Y, et al. Synthetic Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide Stimulatory Effect on Insulin and Glucagon Secretion in the Rat. Diabetes. 1977;26(5):480–484. doi:10.2337/diab.26.5.480

310. Chia CW, Carlson OD, Kim W, et al. Exogenous Glucose–Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Worsens Post prandial Hyperglycemia in T ype 2 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2009;58(6):1342–1349. doi:10.2337/db08-0958

311. Meier JJ, Gallwitz B, Siepmann N, et al. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) dose-dependently stimulates glucagon secretion in healthy human subjects at euglycaemia. Diabetologia. 2003;46(6):798–801. doi:10.1007/s00125-003-1103-y

312. Lynn FC, Pamir N, Ng EHC, McIntosh CHS, Kieffer TJ, Pederson RA. Defective Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Receptor Expression in Diabetic Fatty Zucker Rats. Diabetes. 2001;50(5):1004–1011. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.5.1004

313. El K, Campbell JE. The role of GIP in α-cells and glucagon secretion. Peptides. 2020;125:170213. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170213

314. Mj BB. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide enhancement of the insulin effect on fatty acid incorporation into adipose tissue in the rat. Regul Pept. 1983;7:3–8. doi:10.1016/0167-0115(83)90276-8

315. Thomsen C, Rasmussen O, Lousen T, et al. Differential effects of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids on postprandial lipemia and incretin responses in healthy subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69(6):1135–1143. doi:10.1093/ajcn/69.6.1135

316. Miyawaki K, Yamada Y, Ban N, et al. Inhibition of gastric inhibitory polypeptide signaling prevents obesity. Nature Med. 2002;8(7):738–742. doi:10.1038/nm727

317. Naitoh R, Miyawaki K, Harada N, et al. Inhibition of GIP signaling modulates adiponectin levels under high-fat diet in mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008;376(1):21–25. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.08.052

318. Zhou H, Yamada Y, Tsukiyama K, et al. Gastric inhibitory polypeptide modulates adiposity and fat oxidation under diminished insulin action. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;335(3):937–942. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.07.164

319. Althage MC, Ford EL, Wang S, Tso P, Polonsky KS, Wice BM. Targeted Ablation of Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide-producing Cells in Transgenic Mice Reduces Obesity and Insulin Resistance Induced by a High Fat Diet. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(26):18365–18376. doi:10.1074/jbc.M710466200

320. Irwin N, McClean PL, O’Harte FPM, Gault VA, Harriott P, Flatt PR. Early administration of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor antagonist (Pro3)GIP prevents the development of diabetes and related metabolic abnormalities associated with genetically inherited obesity in ob/ob mice. Diabetologia. 2007;50(7):1532–1540. doi:10.1007/s00125-007-0692-2

321. Thondam SK, Cuthbertson DJ, Wilding JPH. The influence of Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP) on human adipose tissue and fat metabolism: implications for obesity, type 2 diabetes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Peptides. 2020;125:170208. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170208

322. Ceperuelo-Mallafré V, Duran X, Pachón G, et al. Disruption of GIP/GIPR Axis in Human Adipose Tissue Is Linked to Obesity and Insulin Resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(5):E908–E919. doi:10.1210/jc.2013-3350

323. Starich GH, Bar RS, Mazzaferri EL. GIP increases insulin receptor affinity and cellular sensitivity in adipocytes. Am J Physiol. 1985;249(6 Pt 1):E603–607. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1985.249.6.E603

324. Bollag RJ, Zhong Q, Ding KH, et al. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide is an integrative hormone with osteotropic effects. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;177(1–2):35–41. doi:10.1016/S0303-7207(01)00405-1

325. Tsukiyama K, Yamada Y, Yamada C, et al. Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide as an Endogenous Factor Promoting New Bone Formation after Food Ingestion. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20(7):1644–1651. doi:10.1210/me.2005-0187

326. Xie D, Zhong Q, Ding K-H, et al. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide-overexpressing transgenic mice have increased bone mass. Bone. 2007;40(5):1352–1360. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2007.01.007

327. Stensen S, Gasbjerg LS, Helsted MM, Hartmann B, Christensen MB, Knop FK. GIP and the gut-bone axis – physiological, pathophysiological and potential therapeutic implications. Peptides. 2020;125:170197. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170197

328. Skov-Jeppesen K, Svane MS, Martinussen C, et al. GLP-2 and GIP exert separate effects on bone turnover: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy young men. Bone. 2019;125:178–185. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2019.05.014

329. Christensen MB, Lund A, Calanna S, et al. Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide (GIP) Inhibits Bone Resorption Independently of Insulin and Glycemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(1):288–294. doi:10.1210/jc.2017-01949

330. Hansen MS, Søe K, Christensen LL, et al. GIP reduces osteoclast activity and improves osteoblast survival in primary human bone cells. Eur J Endocrinol. 2023;188(1):144–157. doi:10.1093/ejendo/lvac004

331. Zhang Q, Delessa CT, Augustin R, et al. The glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) regulates body weight and food intake via CNS-GIPR signaling. Cell Metab. 2021;33(4):833–844.e835. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2021.01.015

332. Adriaenssens AE, Biggs EK, Darwish T, et al. Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide Receptor-Expressing Cells in the Hypothalamus Regulate Food Intake. Cell Metab. 2019;30(5):987–996.e986. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.07.013

333. Samms RJ, Coghlan MP, Sloop KW. How May GIP Enhance the Therapeutic Efficacy of GLP-1?. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31(6):410–421. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2020.02.006

334. Salehi M, Aulinger B, D’Alessio DA. Effect of Glycemia on Plasma Incretins and the Incretin Effect During Oral Glucose Tolerance Test. Diabetes. 2012;61(11):2728.

335. Hansotia T, Baggio LL, Delmeire D, et al. Double Incretin Receptor Knockout (DIRKO) Mice Reveal an Essential Role for the Enteroinsular Axis in Transducing the Glucoregulatory Actions of DPP-IV Inhibitors. Diabetes. 2004;53(5):1326–1335. doi:10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1326

336. Hansotia T, Maida A, Flock G, et al. Extrapancreatic incretin receptors modulate glucose homeostasis, body weight, and energy expenditure. J Clin Investig. 2007;117(1):143–152. doi:10.1172/JCI25483

337. Ayala JE, Bracy DP, Hansotia T, et al. Insulin Action in the Double Incretin Receptor Knockout Mouse. Diabetes. 2008;57(2):288. doi:10.2337/db07-0704

338. Finan B, Yang B, Ottaway N, et al. A rationally designed monomeric peptide triagonist corrects obesity and diabetes in rodents. Nature Med. 2015;21(1):27–36. doi:10.1038/nm.3761

339. Holst JJ, Rosenkilde MM. GIP as a Therapeutic Target in Diabetes and Obesity: insight From Incretin Co-agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(8):e2710–e2716. doi:10.1210/clinem/dgaa327

340. Cui J, Shang A, Wang W, Chen W. Rational design of a GLP-1/GIP/Gcg receptor triagonist to correct hyperglycemia, obesity and diabetic nephropathy in rodent animals. Life Sci. 2020;260:118339. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118339

341. Jastreboff AM, Kaplan LM, Frías JP, et al. Triple–Hormone-Receptor Agonist Retatrutide for Obesity — a Phase 2 Trial. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(6):514–526. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2301972

342. Urva S, Coskun T, Loh MT, et al. LY3437943, a novel triple GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon receptor agonist in people with type 2 diabetes: a phase 1b, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multiple-ascending dose trial. Lancet. 2022;400(10366):1869–1881. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02033-5

343. Alicic RZ, Rooney MT, Tuttle KR. Diabetic Kidney Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(12):2032. doi:10.2215/CJN.11491116

344. Duh EJ, Sun JK, Stitt AW. Diabetic retinopathy: current understanding, mechanisms, and treatment strategies. JCI Insight. 2017;2(14):e93751. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.93751

345. Leon BM, Maddox TM. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. World j Diabetes. 2015;6(13):1246–1258. doi:10.4239/wjd.v6.i13.1246

346. Best JH, Hoogwerf BJ, Herman WH, et al. Risk of cardiovascular disease events in patients with type 2 diabetes prescribed the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide twice daily or other glucose-lowering therapies: a retrospective analysis of the LifeLink database. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):90–95. doi:10.2337/dc10-1393

347. Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K, et al. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):311–322. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603827

348. Gerstein HC, Colhoun HM, Dagenais GR, et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10193):121–130. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31149-3

349. Husain M, Birkenfeld AL, Donsmark M, et al. Oral Semaglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(9):841–851. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1901118