Fitness
Vitamin D, Vaspin and Acute Myocardial Infarction | IJGM
Mukhtiar Baig,1 Kamal Waheeb Alghalayini,2 Zohair Jamil Gazzaz,3 Manal Abdulaziz Murad4
1Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Consultant Cardiologist, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Correspondence: Mukhtiar Baig, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966581083289, Email [email protected]
Purpose: The current study investigated and compared serum levels of vitamin D (VD) and vaspin in AMI patients and healthy subjects and correlated these biomarkers with other biochemical risk factors for AMI.
Patients and Methods: The research was carried out at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah. Blood samples and additional information were gathered from 110 admitted AMI patients in the Intensive Coronary Care Unit (ICCU) (ages 40– 65 years) and 50 adult, healthy volunteers whose BMI and age were similar to those of the patients.
Results: AMI patients had significantly lower vaspin (p 20 – Conclusion: Compared to the healthy group, AMI patients showed significantly lower vaspin and VD levels. Additionally, AMI patients had a higher prevalence of VD deficiency and insufficiency, suggesting its possible role in the occurrence of AMI.
Keywords: vitamin D, vaspin, myocardial infarction, BMI, vitamin D deficiency, HDL-C
Introduction
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) stands as a leading trigger for fatalities and disabilities globally, emphasizing a significant health risk and imposing substantial fiscal burdens.1 The American Heart Association’s report (2021) indicates that coronary heart disease (CHD) alone accounts for approximately 9.1 million annual deaths globally.2 Among the factors contributing to cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), reduced levels of vaspin and vitamin D (VD) have gained recent attention as coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors.3,4
While socio-economic improvements in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have been noted, there has been a rise in chronic non-communicable diseases due to reduced physical activity, including diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and CHD. A recent Saudi study highlighted alarming obesity rates—1 in 4 individuals is obese, and 1 in 3 is overweight.5 The National Medical and Health Research Strategy (NMHRS) reports that approximately 26% of Saudis suffer from CVDs. The economic impact of CVDs is estimated to reach 80 billion Saudi riyals (21.33 billion dollars) by 2032.6
Vaspin, a small visceral adipose tissue-derived adipokine (containing 415 amino acids), has been associated with insulin sensitivity, exhibiting negative associations with waist-hip ratio, waist circumference, serum glucose, and body mass index (BMI).7 A review paper reported serum vaspin is positively linked with BMI and insulin response and enhances glucose tolerance, implying an alternative role in reactions to decreased insulin signaling in adiposity.8
A few studies have identified reduced levels of vaspin in patients with atherosclerosis.9,10 A Turkish study found a link between vaspin rs2236242 polymorphism and CAD and noted significantly lower serum vaspin levels in CAD patients.11 A meta-analysis suggested that an elevated risk of atherosclerosis was linked to lower vaspin levels.3 Despite its complex metabolic roles, vaspin shows promise as a potential prognostic biomarker in post-MI individuals.12
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is a recognized worldwide issue, with prevalence rates of 42.7%, 40.4%, 36.8%, and 24.0% in KSA, Europe, Canada, and the United States, respectively.13–15 A Turkish study reported VDD among T2DM individuals, and they observed an inverse relationship between HbA1c levels and VD.16
Despite the fact that KSA has sunny weather, VD insufficiency is common among its population. The high frequency of VDD can be due to numerous causes. These causes include lifestyle changes such as daytime sleep and evening activity, the deskbound nature of the job, the use of veils among females, high temperatures that restrict sun exposure, and depleted utilization of vitamin D-rich foods and supplements.13 Several non-skeletal metabolic dysfunctions associated with vitamin D deficiency in the Saudi population, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, T2DM, and auto-immune diseases, could improve with vitamin D correction. However, a Saudi expert panel did not support population-based screening. Instead, it advocated limited vitamin D testing for those individuals at the highest risk for VDD and who will benefit the most from vitamin D status correction.17
The literature consistently indicates higher occurrences of VDD in AMI patients compared to control groups.18,19 Interestingly, a multicenter study reported VDD in all AMI patients.20 However, conflicting reports exist; a study found no significant difference in VD levels among AMI patients and controls,21 while other correlated elevated VD levels with increased risks of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and AMI.22 A study by Qi L et al reported vitamin D levels to be inversely associated with coronary heart disease and concluded that higher levels of vitamin D were linked to a lower risk of CHD.23
Given the high prevalence of atherosclerotic disease and its associated fatalities, ongoing efforts target traditional risk factors. However, exploring new cardiovascular risk factors continues to enable early diagnosis and preventive treatments, ultimately reducing unwanted cardiovascular events.9
The existing literature presents conflicting findings regarding the implications of serum VD and vaspin levels in the AMI process. Hence, this research was conceived to investigate and compare serum levels of VD and vaspin in AMI patients and healthy subjects within the local population and to correlate these biomarkers with other biochemical risk factors for AMI.
Materials and Methods
Study Design and Setting
This cross-sectional investigation was executed in the ICCU at KAUH in Jeddah, KSA. Research Ethics Committee of KAU, Jeddah (Reference No. 292–18) gave their clearance for the study. All experiments were conducted in compliance with the relevant standards and laws and conformity with the Helsinki Declaration. The study protocol was fully clarified to all participants, and written informed consent was sought and documented from each participant. The patient data and blood samples were collected from March 2019 to March 2020.
General information and blood samples were collected from a total of 110 adults admitted as AMI patients, with ages ranging from 40 to 65 years. Additionally, samples were collected from 50 healthy adult subjects who had the same age and BMI as the AMI patients. The subjects in the control group were chosen from the general public. A two-day free blood sugar and lipid profile camp was arranged to recruit healthy participants from university teaching and non-teaching staff, as well as the general public. These free camp dates were publicized in brochures and panaflex banners two weeks before the camp. More than 100 healthy subjects’ blood samples were collected after they provided written consent. A detailed history was taken, and the researchers performed a physical examination. All subjects’ blood sugar and lipid profiles were performed. However, only healthy volunteers whose age and BMI matched those of the patients were included in the study, and their blood samples were further analyzed for the research parameters. People who attended the camp, their blood sugar, history, and physical examination helped to select healthy volunteers for the research. In both groups, participants with systemic diseases such as Cushing disease, thyroid and parathyroid disorders, liver diseases, intestinal diseases, prolonged renal diseases, or those who were taking drugs that potentially influence vaspin and VD were eliminated from the research. Thirty AMI patients had T2DM. A proforma was used to gather information on age, level of education, marital status, history of any other disease, occupation, physical activities, and complete cardiovascular physical examination findings. BMI was computed after measuring height in meters and weight in kilograms. The waist-to-hip (W/H) ratio was determined using hip and waist circumference measurements. “Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] level 20- 24
A five-milliliter blood sample was drawn in the morning following a 12–14 hour fast from each subject. After centrifugation, the samples were kept at −70°C for subsequent analyses. Serum vaspin and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] (VD) were analyzed using the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method with kits provided by Beijing Mesochem Technology Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China). ELISA is a method used to identify the existence of antigens in biological materials. Like other forms of immunoassays, it operates on the principle that specific antibodies attach to the target antigen, allowing for the identification and measurement of the bound antigens. According to the provided kits booklet, the difference in intra-assay and inter-assay was less than 9% and 15%, respectively, for vaspin and vitamin D kits. TG, TC, (HDLc, LDLc, FPG, and HbA1c were measured in the KAUH laboratory using readily available autoanalyzer kits (Roche Modular P-800, Germany).
Statistical Analysis
The frequency and percentage of qualitative data are shown, while quantitative data are characterized by median and interquartile range (IQR). The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test showed a non-normal data distribution (p U-test was applied to assess the variance between the two groups. The Spearman correlation was also utilized to investigate the relationships between vaspin, VD, and baseline clinical and biochemical characteristics. Significance was established at a p-value less than 0.05. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.
Results
A total of 110 adults admitted as AMI patients (93 males and 17 females) and 50 healthy volunteers (25 males and 25 females) were recruited for the study. AMI patients had significantly lower vaspin (p Table 1).
Table 1 Comparison of Baseline Parameters Among Study Groups |
Among the AMI patients, 15 (13.6%) had deficient serum VD levels (≤20 ng/mL), 60 (54.5%) had insufficient levels (>20 – Table 2).
Table 2 Comparison of Patients and Control According to Vitamin D Levels (Deficient, Insufficient, and Sufficient) |
Serum vaspin and VD were significantly decreased in normal weight, overweight, and obese groups in AMI patients compared to control subjects (Table 3). Serum vaspin was correlated with age in AMI patients and with HbA1c in the control group. VD did not show a significant correlation with any variable in AMI patients (Table 4).
Table 3 Comparison of Serum Vaspin and Vitamin D According to BMI Categories in AMI Patients and Healthy Control Subjects |
Table 4 Spearman Correlation of Vitamin D and Vaspin with Baseline Parameters Among Study Groups |
The gender-based VD comparison between male patients and male controls was significantly lower in AMI male patients (p Figure 1). Serum VD level was significantly higher in male patients than in female patients (p = 0.01). Nevertheless, there was no discernible difference between the control groups of females and males (p = 0.29) (Figure 2).
Figure 1 Comparison of vitamin D levels in male and female patients compared to controls (Clustered boxplots). *Significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05. |
Figure 2 Comparisons of vitamin D levels between male and female patients and controls (Clustered boxplots). *Significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05. |
For serum vaspin, the gender-based comparison between male patients and male controls showed that it was significantly lower in AMI male patients than in healthy males (p Figure 3). Among patient categories, female patients had considerably greater serum vaspin levels than male patients (p Figure 4).
Figure 3 Comparison of vaspin in male and female patients compared to controls (Clustered boxplots). *Significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05. |
Figure 4 Comparisons of serum vaspin levels between male and female patients and controls (Clustered boxplots). *Significance was determined by a p-value less than 0.05. |
Discussion
In recent years, significant strides have been taken to identify biomarkers for the risk stratification of AMI patients. Among these biomarkers, vaspin has gained attention for its association with the occurrence of metabolic syndrome and atherosclerosis.25
The current study observed that AMI patients exhibit significantly lower vaspin levels than healthy subjects. This finding corroborates the findings from various studies.9,11,26 The significance of maintaining optimal serum vaspin levels in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) is highlighted in the literature. High vaspin levels have been associated with a substantial decrease in adverse cardiac events compared to low vaspin levels.27 A meta-analysis further supported elevated vaspin levels being linked to a reduced risk of atherosclerosis.3 Zhou et al, in 1036 MI patients, reported an increased frequency of MI in individuals with low vaspin levels.28
However, contrary to our findings, some studies have advocated that raised serum vaspin levels may contribute to atherosclerosis.29,30 This discrepancy in Results underscores the complexity of vaspin’s role and the need for further research to elucidate its mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases. Notably, the present study did not identify a significant gender variation in vaspin levels in healthy subjects, aligning with findings from another study.31 Conversely, a study reported significantly higher vaspin levels in females than males,32 but the underlying reasons for this gender difference remain unclear.
The present study did not find a significant correlation between serum vaspin and HbA1c in AMI patients. However, a negative correlation between serum vaspin and HbA1c was observed in the control group. Similar to our study, an Egyptian study also reported no correlation between vaspin and HbA1c in diabetic subjects and those with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD).29 On the other hand, another study reported a positive correlation between serum vaspin levels and HbA1c in diabetic individuals, suggesting a compensatory response.33 The exact explanation for this association is still unclear. Interestingly, the present study found a positive correlation between age and serum vaspin in AMI patients. A Korean study reported a positive correlation between age and serum vaspin in healthy individuals.34 We do not have an exact explanation of this relationship.
Vaspin emerges as a promising predictive biomarker among MI patients, with low levels associated with an augmented risk of adverse cardiac events.10 Additionally, the study suggested that vaspin may be protective by improving left ventricular ejection fraction after MI. Studies have reported that vaspin, through targeting vascular cells, has the potential to exert anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic outcomes.35
While the mechanisms of vaspin’s involvement in the progression and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases are not completely described, studies indicate inflammation plays a vital role in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis.36 Inflammation is also implicated in cardiac remodeling post-MI. Therefore, vaspin could contribute to myocardial remodeling while improving cardiovascular prognosis in MI patients, partly through its anti-inflammatory effects.37 Another study reported that vaspin increases nitric oxide bioavailability among vascular endothelial cells, demonstrating a novel molecular mechanism for the anti-atherogenic action of vaspin.38 A recent meta-analysis further highlighted the favorable role of high serum vaspin levels in preventing atherosclerosis in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) or endothelial cells.3 The complexity of vaspin’s role in cardiovascular health underscores the need for continued research to unravel its mechanisms and potential therapeutic applications.
Our study reports that AMI patients have considerably lower VD than the control group. The serum VD level was deficient, insufficient, and sufficient in 15 (13.6%), 60 (54.5%), and 35 (31.8%) AMI patients, respectively. Overall, 68% of the AMI patients had below-normal VD levels. The current results align with several other studies that found significantly lower VD levels among MI patients than in the control group.18,19 A recent Pakistani study reported that VDD was observed in nearly half of the AMI patients (45.5%) and patients who had reduced VD status were more inclined to have a poor hospital prognosis (60.6%) compared to individuals with adequate VD status.39 An Iranian study reported VD insufficiency in 56% and deficiency in 6% of CAD patients.40 Another study stated that 67.5% of those with reduced VD levels were deficient, whereas 16.5% had insufficient levels.18 A recent study investigated the correlation between serum VD and 10-year Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk in middle-aged and older persons and reported that reduced VD levels are linked with an elevated ASCVD risk.41 Another study reported an association of low VD levels with an elevated CAD risk.4
Across the control groups, there was no variation in VD levels based on gender. Our results contrast with a few studies.42–44 This variation may be attributed to factors such as the smaller number of females, dietary habits, or geographical differences. A recent study reported no gender-wise difference in VD levels between diabetic and non-diabetic individuals.45 The frequency of VDD in individuals with AMI, as reported in our study and supported by others,4,18 underscores the importance of VD in cardiovascular health and its potential implications for adverse outcomes. The current study found that serum vaspin and VD levels were considerably lower in AMI patients, regardless of their weight category (normal weight, overweight, or obese), compared to control subjects. It seems that BMI did not influence serum vaspin and VD levels among our study participants.
The lack of a significant relationship between VD levels and different biochemical parameters in AMI and control groups could be influenced by various factors, including geographical variation, small sample size, racial diversity, and cultural backgrounds. A study reported no significant heterogeneity in VD levels with respect to age and gender; however, VDD was reported to be more commonly observed in patients with low socio-economic status, low activity levels, DM, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and among smokers as well.46
Although research has supported the fact that VD induces cardio-protective effects and their potential mechanisms have been identified, the studies have remained inconsistent.47 A study reported that VD has no significant association with various biochemical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic cardiac structure and function measurements among elderly patients.22
The literature presents intriguing perspectives on the relationship between VDD and CAD. While both conditions share risk factors like overweight, use of tobacco, and sedentary lifestyle, some suggest that their strong association might not necessarily imply a causal relationship but rather coexistence.48
Studies showed VD’s protective role against cardiovascular disease by mitigating inflammatory responses, regulating the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone pathway, and reducing oxidative stress.49,50 However, despite observational studies indicating a link between increased VD and a decreased risk of cardiovascular disease, interventional studies do not strongly advocate routine VD administration for treating or preventing cardiovascular diseases.51–53 It seems maintaining optimal VD levels is beneficial for a healthy heart.
While a number of studies have discovered a connection between CAD and VD levels, a substantial body of research has contradicted this association.48,54 Therefore, the association between VD levels and CAD remains contentious, with conflicting research findings. Some studies, like Jorde R et al, observed no disparity in VD levels between MI and non-MI controls,21 while others, such as Rajasree et al, suggested that high VD levels could increase the risk of IHD.55
Plausible explanations for VD’s pathophysiological role in MI involve its impact on various systems within the body. VD deficiency might lead to the upregulation of the Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone System (RAAS), resulting in hypertension, vascular smooth muscle cell hypertrophy, as well as the left ventricle, which is a marker of a cardiovascular adverse event.46,56 Moreover, VDD has been linked with T2DM due to its effect on insulin resistance, beta cell function, and inflammation, all of which contribute to cardiovascular disease risk.56,57
The current study’s findings emphasize the significance of exploring the roles of VD and vaspin in cardiovascular health, suggesting implications for AMI prevention and therapy. Those individuals who are at risk for AMI need to be monitored and regularly checked for their VD with other parameters. If the VD level is found below normal, it is possible that supplementation of VD might reduce AMI risk in such cases. Additionally, the reduced levels of vaspin in AMI patients highlight the intricate interplay of various factors in cardiovascular health.
Recognizing CAD’s high prevalence and severe consequences, ongoing exploration of risk factors and novel therapeutics remains crucial. Acknowledging that solely evaluating vaspin and VD might not offer a comprehensive estimation of AMI is crucial. A multi-marker method is becoming more popular, which integrates multiple biomarkers to more accurately stratify coronary atherosclerosis and forecast its prognosis.58
Limitations and Recommendations
The cross-sectional design of the study, capturing data at a single point in time, presents challenges in establishing a causal relationship between VD, vaspin, and AMI. Several confounding variables may impact the present study results, such as other comorbidities, lifestyle factors, dietary habits, seasonal variations in VD, and individual exposure to sunlight. Additionally, VD concentration is influenced by cultural practices, dark complexion, hot climate, limited outdoor activity, obesity, and the lack of appropriate legal regulations regarding fortifying food with vitamin D.
Future research should consider these variables to enhance the study’s robustness. Additionally, the single center setting at the ICCU of KAUH in Jeddah limits the generalizability of the findings. Future studies should consider multicentric approaches to include a broader demographic.
Recognizing and addressing these limitations is crucial for comprehensively interpreting the study’s outcomes. Future research could address these limitations to strengthen the evidence base on the connection between VD, vaspin, and AMI.
Conclusion
The markedly lower levels of vaspin and VD observed in AMI patients emphasize the potential implications of these biomarkers for cardiovascular health. Additionally, the study sheds light on the prevalent inadequacy of VD among AMI patients, with over half falling into categories of deficiency and insufficiency. This highlights the importance of monitoring and addressing vitamin D status in individuals at risk for AMI.
Our findings add to the existing body of knowledge regarding the interplay between VD, vaspin, and cardiovascular health. The study paves the way for further investigations into the mechanistic aspects of these associations. Future research, particularly longitudinal studies, will be essential to unraveling the temporal sequence of events and better understanding causality. These insights may inform targeted interventions and therapeutic strategies to prevent and manage AMI.
Funding
This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant No. G-349-828-1440. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR’s technical and financial support with thanks.
Disclosure
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
References
1. Roth G, Mensah G, Johnson C, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
2. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022;145(8):e153–e639. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052
3. Danuaji R, Suroto S, Purwanto B, et al. Serum vaspin role in atherosclerosis and glucose tolerance disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2023;13:024–41.
4. Balakrishna PS, Vasu J, Bastian C. Correlation between serum vitamin D levels and severity of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing coronary angiography in South Indian population. Eur J Cardiovasc Med. 2023;13:1657–1661.
5. Alsulami S, Baig M, Ahmad T, et al. Obesity prevalence, physical activity, and dietary practices among adults in Saudi Arabia. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1124051. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1124051
6. Strategic Priorities for Advanced Medical and Health Research. King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology Doc. No. 39P0001-PLN-0001-ER01 The King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST) and Ministry of Economy and Planning (MoEP). Available from: http://www.kacst.edu.sa/en/research/Documents/MedicalAndHealth.pdf.
7. Tasnim F, Faruque MO, Hassan Z. Serum vaspin levels are associated with decreased insulin sensitivity in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in Bangladesh. J Taibah Uni Med Sci. 2015;10:327–332.
8. Heiker JT. Vaspin (serpinA12) in obesity, insulin resistance, and inflammation. J Pept Sci. 2014;20(5):299–306. doi:10.1002/psc.2621
9. Stavileci B, Koldaş ZL. The relationship between Vaspin, Nesfatin-1 plasma levels, and the presence of fragmented QRS with the severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Adv Med Sci. 2022;67(2):298–303. doi:10.1016/j.advms.2022.07.005
10. Zhang B, Peng W, Wang K, Li H, Xu Y. Vaspin as a prognostic marker in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25(3):257–264. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2015.07.001
11. Akcılar R, Yümün G, Bayat Z, et al. Association of vaspin rs2236242 gene variants and circulating serum vaspin concentrations with coronary artery disease in a Turkish population. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236(5):3734–3739. doi:10.1002/jcp.30112
12. Mănescu IB, Pál K, Lupu S, Dobreanu M. Conventional biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with heart disease. Life. 2022;12(12):2112. doi:10.3390/life12122112
13. Abdelsalam M, Nagy E, Abdalbary M, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of vitamin D deficiency in high altitude region in Saudi Arabia: three-year retrospective study. Int J Gen Med. 2023;Volume 16:2961–2970. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S418811
14. Cashman KD, Dowling KG, Skrabakova Z, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in Europe: pandemic? Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103(4):1033–1044. doi:10.3945/ajcn.115.120873
15. Schleicher RL, Sternberg MR, Looker AC, et al. National estimates of serum total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D and metabolite concentrations measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in the US population during 2007–2010. J Nutr. 2016;146(5):1051–1061. doi:10.3945/jn.115.227728
16. Erkus E, Aktas G, Kocak MZ, et al. Diabetic regulation of subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with serum vitamin D levels. AMB Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2019;65(1):51–55. doi:10.1590/1806-9282.65.1.51
17. Al-Daghri NM, Al-Saleh Y, Aljohani N, et al. Vitamin D status correction in Saudi Arabia: an experts’ consensus under the auspices of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Arch osteoporos. 2017;12(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s11657-016-0295-y
18. Javadzadegan H, Separham A, Farokhi A, Applegate C, Nader ND. The critically low levels of vitamin D predict the resolution of the ST-segment elevation after the primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Cardiol. 2023;78(1):40–46. doi:10.1080/00015385.2021.2015144
19. Aslanabadi N, Jangioskouei N, Jafari N, et al. Association of serum vitamin D levels with coronary artery angiographic findings; A cross-sectional study. J Prev Epidemiol. 2023;8:e26181. doi:10.34172/jpe.2023.26181
20. Robinson-Cohen C, Hoofnagle AN, Ix JH, et al. Racial differences in the association of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration with coronary heart disease events. JAMA. 2013;310(2):179–188. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.7228
21. Jorde R, Schirmer H, Wilsgaard T, et al. Polymorphisms related to the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and risk of myocardial infarction, diabetes, cancer, and mortality. The tromsø study. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37295–305. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037295
22. van Ballegooijen AJ, Visser M, Kestenbaum B, et al. Relation of vitamin D and parathyroid hormone to cardiac biomarkers and to left ventricular mass (from the Cardiovascular Health Study). Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(3):418–424. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.10.021
23. Qi L, Ma W, Heianza Y, et al. Independent and synergistic associations of biomarkers of vitamin D status with risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2017;37(11):2204–2212. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309548
24. Holick MF. Vitamin D status: measurement, interpretation, and clinical application. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(2):73–78. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.12.001
25. Dimova R, Tankova T. The role of vaspin in the development of metabolic and glucose tolerance disorders and atherosclerosis. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:823481–823488. doi:10.1155/2015/823481
26. Guimei YE, Yongqiang XI. Evaluation of serum IL-34, GLP-1, and vaspin on cardiovascular adverse events in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Clin Emerg. 2022;23:442–447.
27. Su Y, Ming Q, Li W, Peng W, Li H, Xu Y. Serum vaspin: a reliable independent predictor for major adverse cardiac events. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9(9):18133–18141.
28. Zhou X, Chen Y, Tao Y, Zhang W, Xu W, Lu X. Serum vaspin as a predictor of adverse cardiac events in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(6):e10934–40. doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010934
29. El-Lebedy DH, Ibrahim AA, Ashmawy IO. Novel adipokines vaspin and irisin as risk biomarkers for cardiovascular diseases. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018;12(4):643–648. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2018.04.025
30. Esaki E, Adachi H, Hirai Y, et al. Serum vaspin levels are positively associated with carotid atherosclerosis in the general population. Atherosclerosis. 2014;233(1):248–252. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.12.040
31. Sheriaba NA. The relationship between serum vaspin levels and the presence of macro vascular complications; ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular stroke in type 2 diabetes mellitus cases. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2016;7:10066–10070.
32. Yang L, Chen SJ, Yuan GY, Wang D, Chen JJ. Changes and clinical significance of serum vaspin levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14(3):11356–11361. doi:10.4238/2015.September.25.2
33. Gulcelik NE, Karakaya J, Gedik A, Usman A, Gurlek A. Serum vaspin levels in type 2 diabetic women in relation to microvascular complications. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;160(1):65–70. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0723
34. Chang HM, Park HS, Park CY, Song YS, Jang YJ. Association between serum vaspin concentrations and visceral adipose tissue in Korean subjects. Metabolism. 2010;59(9):1276–1281. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2009.11.021
35. Yamawaki H. Vascular effects of novel adipocytokines: focus on vascular contractility and inflammatory responses. Biol Pharm Bull. 2011;34(3):307–310. doi:10.1248/bpb.34.307
36. Christodoulidis G, Vittorio TJ, Fudim M, Lerakis S, Kosmas CE. Inflammation in coronary artery disease. Cardiol Rev. 2014;22(6):279–288. doi:10.1097/CRD.0000000000000006
37. Krintus M, Kozinski M, Kubica J, Sypniewska G. Critical appraisal of inflammatory markers in cardiovascular risk stratification. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2014;51(5):263–279. doi:10.3109/10408363.2014.913549
38. Frangogiannis NG. The inflammatory response in myocardial injury, repair, and remodelling. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(5):255–265. doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2014.28
39. Din N, Haq EU, Adeel M. Association of Serum Vit D level with in-hospital outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2023;17:281–284. doi:10.53350/pjmhs2023174281
40. Moradi M, Foroutanfar A. Evaluation of vitamin D levels in relation to coronary CT angiographic findings in an Iranian population. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017;13:361–367. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S142721
41. Zhou Y, Jiang M, Sun JY, et al. The association between vitamin D levels and the 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a population-based study. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2023;38(5):E178–E186. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000943
42. Lee JH, Kim YA, Kim YS, Lee Y, Seo JH. Association between vitamin D deficiency and clinical parameters in men and women aged 50 years or older: a cross-sectional cohort study. Nutrients. 2023;15(13):3043. doi:10.3390/nu15133043
43. Tuffaha M, El Bcheraoui C, Daoud F, et al. Deficiencies under plenty of sun: vitamin D status among adults in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2013. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7(10):467–475. doi:10.4103/1947-2714.168675
44. Yu C, Xue H, Wang L, et al. Serum bioavailable and free 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, but not its total level, are associated with the risk of mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Circ Res. 2018;123(8):996–1007. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313558
45. Alzahrani SH, Baig M, Yaghmour KA, Al Muammar S. Determinants of Vitamin D deficiency among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a retrospective study. Medicine. 2024;103(8):e37291. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000037291
46. Karur S, Veerappa V, Nanjappa MC. Study of vitamin D deficiency prevalence in acute myocardial infarction. IJC Heart Vessels. 2014;3:57–59. doi:10.1016/j.ijchv.2014.03.004
47. Schnatz PF, Manson JE. Vitamin D, and cardiovascular disease: an appraisal of the evidence. Clin Chem. 2014;60(4):600–609. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2013.211037
48. Cerit L, Cerit Z. Vitamin D deficiency is not associated with higher levels of SYNTAX score. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34(1):57–61. doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0178
49. Cosentino N, Campodonico J, Milazzo V, et al. Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: current evidence and future perspectives. Nutrients. 2021;13(10):3603. doi:10.3390/nu13103603
50. Soh V, Tan SJX, Sehgal R, et al. The relationship between vitamin D status and cardiovascular diseases. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46(7):100836. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100836
51. Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. Vitamin D supplements and prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):33–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1809944
52. Barbarawi M, Kheiri B, Zayed Y, et al. Vitamin D supplementation and cardiovascular disease risks in more than 83,000 individuals in 21 randomized clinical trials: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4(8):765–776. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1870
53. Scragg R, Stewart AW, Waayer D, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular disease in the vitamin D assessment study: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2(6):608–616. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175
54. Safi M, KhaheShI I, Jafarzadeh S, et al. Evaluation of correlation between serum levels of vitamin D and coronary artery disease: an existing debate. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12:OC1–OC4.
55. Rajasree S, Rajpal K, Kartha CC, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 levels are elevated in South Indian patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(6):567–571. doi:10.1023/A:1014559600042
56. Lund B, Badskjaer J, Lund BJ, Soerensen OH. Vitamin D and ischaemic heart disease. Hormone Metab Res. 1978;10(06):553–556. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1093390
57. Pérez-Hernández N, Aptilon-Duque G, Nostroza-Hernández MC, et al. Vitamin D and its effects on cardiovascular diseases: a comprehensive review. Korean J Intern Med. 2016;31(6):1018–1029. doi:10.3904/kjim.2015.224
58. Mitsis A, Kadoglou NPE, Lambadiari V, et al. Prognostic role of inflammatory cytokines and novel adipokines in acute myocardial infarction: an updated and comprehensive review. Cytokine. 2022;153:e155848. doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2022.155848